• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的队列研究:良性胆囊疾病中急诊胆囊切除术使用的变化。

Population-based cohort study of variation in the use of emergency cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2016 Nov;103(12):1716-1726. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10288. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.10288
PMID:27748962
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aims of this prospective population-based cohort study were to identify the patient and hospital characteristics associated with emergency cholecystectomy, and the influences of these in determining variations between hospitals.

METHODS

Data were collected for consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy in acute UK and Irish hospitals between 1 March and 1 May 2014. Potential explanatory variables influencing the performance of emergency cholecystectomy were analysed by means of multilevel, multivariable logistic regression modelling using a two-level hierarchical structure with patients (level 1) nested within hospitals (level 2).

RESULTS

Data were collected on 4744 cholecystectomies from 165 hospitals. Increasing age, lower ASA fitness grade, biliary colic, the need for further imaging (magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography), endoscopic interventions (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and admission to a non-biliary centre significantly reduced the likelihood of an emergency cholecystectomy being performed. The multilevel model was used to calculate the probability of receiving an emergency cholecystectomy for a woman aged 40 years or over with an ASA grade of I or II and a BMI of at least 25·0 kg/m , who presented with acute cholecystitis with an ultrasound scan showing a thick-walled gallbladder and a normal common bile duct. The mean predicted probability of receiving an emergency cholecystectomy was 0·52 (95 per cent c.i. 0·45 to 0·57). The predicted probabilities ranged from 0·02 to 0·95 across the 165 hospitals, demonstrating significant variation between hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Patients with similar characteristics presenting to different hospitals with acute gallbladder pathology do not receive comparable care.

摘要

背景

本前瞻性基于人群的队列研究旨在确定与急诊胆囊切除术相关的患者和医院特征,并探讨这些因素对医院间差异的影响。

方法

2014 年 3 月 1 日至 5 月 1 日期间,在英国和爱尔兰的急性医院连续收集接受胆囊切除术的患者数据。采用两级层次结构(患者为一级,医院为二级)的多水平多变量逻辑回归模型分析影响急诊胆囊切除术的潜在解释变量。

结果

共纳入了 165 家医院的 4744 例胆囊切除术患者。结果显示,年龄增长、ASA 体能状况分级降低、胆绞痛、需要进一步影像学检查(磁共振胰胆管成像)、内镜介入治疗(内镜逆行胰胆管造影)以及住院于非胆道中心显著降低了行急诊胆囊切除术的可能性。该多水平模型用于计算年龄在 40 岁及以上、ASA 分级为 I 或 II 级、BMI 至少为 25.0kg/m²、表现为急性胆囊炎且超声检查显示胆囊壁厚、胆总管正常的女性接受急诊胆囊切除术的概率。预计接受急诊胆囊切除术的平均概率为 0.52(95%可信区间为 0.45 至 0.57)。165 家医院的预测概率从 0.02 到 0.95 不等,表明医院间存在显著差异。

结论

患有相似特征的患者在不同的医院就诊时,并未得到可比的治疗。

相似文献

1
Population-based cohort study of variation in the use of emergency cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases.基于人群的队列研究:良性胆囊疾病中急诊胆囊切除术使用的变化。
Br J Surg. 2016 Nov;103(12):1716-1726. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10288. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
2
Population-based cohort study of outcomes following cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases.基于人群的胆囊良性疾病行胆囊切除术的结局的队列研究。
Br J Surg. 2016 Nov;103(12):1704-1715. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10287. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
3
Management of acute gallbladder disease in England.英格兰急性胆囊疾病的管理
Br J Surg. 2008 Apr;95(4):472-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5984.
4
Protocol for a multicentre, prospective, population-based cohort study of variation in practice of cholecystectomy and surgical outcomes (The CholeS study).多中心、前瞻性、基于人群的胆囊切除术实践变异性和手术结果的队列研究方案(CholeS 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 12;5(1):e006399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006399.
5
Prospective audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience at a secondary referral centre in South australia.南澳大利亚一家二级转诊中心腹腔镜胆囊切除术经验的前瞻性审计。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 May;76(5):335-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03721.x.
6
Hospital volume and patient outcomes after cholecystectomy in Scotland: retrospective, national population based study.苏格兰胆囊切除术患者术后结局与医院容量的关系:回顾性全国人群研究
BMJ. 2012 May 23;344:e3330. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3330.
7
Significance of preoperative ultrasound measurement of gallbladder wall thickness.术前超声测量胆囊壁厚度的意义。
Am Surg. 2007 Sep;73(9):926-9.
8
Emergency biliary sonography: utility of common bile duct measurement in the diagnosis of cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis.急诊胆道超声检查:胆总管测量在胆囊炎和胆总管结石诊断中的应用
J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in scleroatrophic gallbladders.硬化萎缩性胆囊行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术结果
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2011;22(2):183-9. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2011.0188.
10
Contemporary experience with cholecystectomy: establishing 'benchmarks' two decades after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术的当代经验:在腹腔镜胆囊切除术引入二十年后确立“基准”
Am Surg. 2013 Dec;79(12):1253-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pathway Reduces Elective Waiting Times and Preoperative Admissions: A Prospective Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术路径可减少择期等待时间和术前住院时间:一项前瞻性倾向匹配队列研究。
Med Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 27;13(3):86. doi: 10.3390/medsci13030086.
2
Assessment of routine pre-operative group and save testing in patients undergoing cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.胆囊切除术患者常规术前血型鉴定和交叉配血试验的评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
NIHR Open Res. 2024 Oct 23;4:17. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13543.2. eCollection 2024.
3
Paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy: one site experience of the Chole-QuiC process.
向急诊胆囊切除术转变的范例:Chole-QuiC 流程的单站点经验。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Sep;106(7):601-609. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
4
The safety of telemedicine clinics as an alternative to in-person preoperative assessment for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with benign gallbladder disease: a retrospective cohort study.远程医疗诊所作为良性胆囊疾病患者择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术术前面对面评估替代方式的安全性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Patient Saf Surg. 2023 Aug 29;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00368-7.
5
Should Procalcitonin Be Included in Acute Cholecystitis Guidelines? A Systematic Review.降钙素原是否应纳入急性胆囊炎指南?系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 20;59(4):805. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040805.
6
Early Surgery for Acute Cholecystitis in the Elderly: Getting it Right the First Time.老年人急性胆囊炎的早期手术:一次做对
World J Surg. 2023 Jul;47(7):1711-1712. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-06992-9. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
7
Acute Cholecystitis from Biliary Lithiasis: Diagnosis, Management and Treatment.胆石症所致急性胆囊炎:诊断、处理与治疗
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Feb 28;12(3):482. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030482.
8
The single-stage management of bile duct stones is underutilised: A prospective multicentre cohort study with a literature review.胆管结石的单阶段管理未得到充分利用:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究及文献综述。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2022 Nov 30;26(4):333-338. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.22-001. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
9
The influence of frailty on outcomes for older adults admitted to hospital with benign biliary disease: a single-centre, observational cohort study.衰弱对因良性胆道疾病住院的老年患者结局的影响:单中心观察性队列研究。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Mar;105(3):231-240. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0331. Epub 2022 May 26.
10
Variation in the rates of emergency surgery amongst emergency admissions to hospital for common acute conditions.常见急症入院患者急诊手术率的变化。
BJS Open. 2021 Nov 9;5(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab094.