Mosimann Laura, Traoré Abdallah, Mauti Stephanie, Léchenne Monique, Obrist Brigit, Véron René, Hattendorf Jan, Zinsstag Jakob
Institute of Geography and Sustainability, University of Lausanne, Géopolis, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laboratoire Central Vétérinaire (LCV), Km 8, Route de Koulikoro, Bamako, Mali.
Acta Trop. 2017 Jan;165:203-215. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
In the framework of the research network on integrated control of zoonoses in Africa (ICONZ) a dog rabies mass vaccination campaign was carried out in two communes of Bamako (Mali) in September 2014. A mixed method approach, combining quantitative and qualitative tools, was developed to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention towards optimization for future scale-up. Actions to control rabies occur on one level in households when individuals take the decision to vaccinate their dogs. However, control also depends on provision of vaccination services and community participation at the intermediate level of social resilience. Mixed methods seem necessary as the problem-driven transdisciplinary project includes epidemiological components in addition to social dynamics and cultural, political and institutional issues. Adapting earlier effectiveness models for health intervention to rabies control, we propose a mixed method assessment of individual effectiveness parameters like availability, affordability, accessibility, adequacy or acceptability. Triangulation of quantitative methods (household survey, empirical coverage estimation and spatial analysis) with qualitative findings (participant observation, focus group discussions) facilitate a better understanding of the weight of each effectiveness determinant, and the underlying reasons embedded in the local understandings, cultural practices, and social and political realities of the setting. Using this method, a final effectiveness of 33% for commune Five and 28% for commune Six was estimated, with vaccination coverage of 27% and 20%, respectively. Availability was identified as the most sensitive effectiveness parameter, attributed to lack of information about the campaign. We propose a mixed methods approach to optimize intervention design, using an "intervention effectiveness optimization cycle" with the aim of maximizing effectiveness. Empirical vaccination coverage estimation is compared to the effectiveness model with its determinants. In addition, qualitative data provide an explanatory framework for deeper insight, validation and interpretation of results which should improve the intervention design while involving all stakeholders and increasing community participation. This work contributes vital information for the optimization and scale-up of future vaccination campaigns in Bamako, Mali. The proposed mixed method, although incompletely applied in this case study, should be applicable to similar rabies interventions targeting elimination in other settings.
在非洲人畜共患病综合控制研究网络(ICONZ)的框架下,2014年9月在巴马科(马里)的两个社区开展了犬类狂犬病大规模疫苗接种运动。开发了一种结合定量和定性工具的混合方法,以评估干预措施的有效性,以便为未来扩大规模进行优化。当个人决定为其犬只接种疫苗时,狂犬病控制行动在家庭层面展开。然而,控制还取决于在社会复原力的中间层面提供疫苗接种服务和社区参与。由于这个以问题为驱动的跨学科项目除了社会动态以及文化、政治和体制问题外还包括流行病学成分,混合方法似乎是必要的。我们采用适用于健康干预的早期有效性模型来进行狂犬病控制,提出对诸如可及性、可承受性、可达性、充分性或可接受性等个体有效性参数进行混合方法评估。定量方法(家庭调查、实际覆盖率估计和空间分析)与定性结果(参与观察、焦点小组讨论)的三角互证,有助于更好地理解每个有效性决定因素的权重,以及当地理解、文化习俗以及该环境下的社会和政治现实中所蕴含的潜在原因。使用这种方法,估计第五社区的最终有效性为33%,第六社区为28%,疫苗接种覆盖率分别为27%和20%。可及性被确定为最敏感的有效性参数,这归因于缺乏关于该运动的信息。我们提出一种混合方法来优化干预设计,使用一个“干预有效性优化循环”,旨在使有效性最大化。将实际疫苗接种覆盖率估计与带有其决定因素的有效性模型进行比较。此外,定性数据为更深入地洞察、验证和解释结果提供了一个解释框架,这应能改进干预设计,同时让所有利益相关者参与进来并提高社区参与度。这项工作为马里巴马科未来疫苗接种运动的优化和扩大规模提供了至关重要的信息。所提议的混合方法虽然在本案例研究中未得到完全应用,但应适用于其他环境中以消除狂犬病为目标的类似狂犬病干预措施。