Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤(SCI)患儿的脊髓损伤步行指数II(WISCI-II)评估

Evaluation of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) in children with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).

作者信息

Calhoun Thielen C, Sadowsky C, Vogel L C, Taylor H, Davidson L, Bultman J, Gaughan J, Mulcahey M J

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson College of Health Professions, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

International Center for Spinal Cord Injury, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2017 May;55(5):478-482. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.142. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Mixed methods were used in this study. The appropriateness of the levels of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) for application in children was critically reviewed by physical therapists using the Modified Delphi Technique, and the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the WISCI-II in children was evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the construct validity, and to establish reliability of the WISCI-II related to its use in children with spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

United States of America.

METHODS

Using a Modified Delphi Technique, physical therapists critically reviewed the WISCI-II levels for pediatric utilization. Concurrently, ambulatory children under age 18 years with SCI were evaluated using the WISCI-II on two occasions by the same therapist to establish intra-rater reliability. One trial was photographed and de-identified. Each photograph was reviewed by four different physical therapists who gave WISCI-II scores to establish inter-rater reliability. Summary and descriptive statistics were used to calculate the frequency of yes/no responses for each WISCI-II level question and to determine the percent agreement for each question. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was calculated using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Construct validity was confirmed after one Delphi round during which at least 80% agreement was established by 51 physical therapists on the appropriateness of the WISCI-II levels for children. Fifty-two children with SCI aged 2-17 years completed repeated WISCI-II assessments and 40 de-identified photographs were scored by four physical therapists. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was high (ICC=0.997, CI=0.995-0.998 and ICC=0.97, CI=0.95-0.98, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates support for the use of the WISCI-II in ambulatory children with SCI.

SPONSORSHIP

This study was funded by the Craig H Neilsen Foundation, Spinal Cord Injury Research on the Translation Spectrum, Senior Research Award #282592 (Mulcahey, PI).

摘要

研究设计

本研究采用混合方法。物理治疗师运用改良德尔菲技术对脊髓损伤步行指数II级(WISCI-II)在儿童中的应用水平的适宜性进行了严格审查,并评估了WISCI-II在儿童中的评分者间信度和评分者内信度。

目的

检验结构效度,并确定WISCI-II在脊髓损伤(SCI)儿童中使用时的信度。

地点

美利坚合众国。

方法

物理治疗师运用改良德尔菲技术对WISCI-II在儿科的应用水平进行了严格审查。同时,18岁以下的SCI门诊儿童由同一位治疗师分两次使用WISCI-II进行评估,以确定评分者内信度。对一次试验进行拍照并去除身份标识。四张不同的物理治疗师对每张照片进行审查并给出WISCI-II评分,以确定评分者间信度。使用汇总统计和描述性统计来计算每个WISCI-II水平问题的是/否回答频率,并确定每个问题的一致百分比。评分者间信度和评分者内信度使用组内相关系数(ICC)和95%置信区间(CI)进行计算。

结果

在一轮德尔菲法后,结构效度得到确认,在此期间,51名物理治疗师对WISCI-II在儿童中的适宜性达成了至少80%的一致意见。52名年龄在2至17岁的SCI儿童完成了重复的WISCI-II评估,40张去除身份标识的照片由四名物理治疗师评分。评分者内信度和评分者间信度均较高(ICC分别为0.997,CI为0.995 - 0.998;ICC为0.97 CI为0.95 - 0.98)。

结论

本研究表明支持在SCI门诊儿童中使用WISCI-II。

资助

本研究由克雷格·H·尼尔森基金会资助,脊髓损伤翻译领域研究,高级研究奖#282592(Mulcahey,首席研究员)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验