Pinnington Sarah, Atterton Brigid, Ingleby Sarah
Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Sep 19;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u210706.w4335. eCollection 2016.
Severe sepsis is a clinical emergency. Despite the nationwide recognition of the sepsis six treatment bundle as the first line emergency treatment for this presentation, compliance in sepsis six provision remains inadequately low. The project goals were to improve compliance with the implementation of the Sepsis Six in patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock. In improving timely care delivery it was anticipated improvements would be made in relation to patient safety and experience, and reductions in length of stay (LoS) and mortality. The project intended to make the pathway for those presenting with sepsis safe and consistent, where sepsis is recognised and treated in a timely manner according to best practice. The aim of the project was to understand the what the barriers where to providing safe effective care for the patient presenting with severe sepsis in A&E. Using the Safer Clinical Systems (SCS) tools developed byte Health Foundation and Warwick University, the project team identified the hazards and associated risks in the septic patient pathway. The level of analysis employed enabled the project team to identify the major risks, themes, and factors of influence within this pathway. The analysis identified twenty nine possible interventions, of which six were chosen following option appraisal. Further interventions were recommended to the accident and emergency as part of a business case and further changes in process. Audits identified all severely septic patients presenting to A&E in October 2014 (n=67) and post intervention in September 2015 (n=93). Compared analysis demonstrated an increase in compliance with the implementation of the sepsis six care bundle from 7% to 41%, a reduction in LoS by 1.9 days and a decrease in 30 day mortality by 50%. Additional audit reviewed the management of 10 septic patients per week for the duration of the project to assess the real time impact of the selected interventions.
严重脓毒症是一种临床急症。尽管全国范围内都认可脓毒症六项治疗集束作为针对该病症的一线紧急治疗方法,但脓毒症六项治疗的依从性仍然低得令人无法接受。该项目的目标是提高严重脓毒症和/或感染性休克患者对脓毒症六项治疗集束的实施依从性。在改善及时护理方面,预计将在患者安全和体验方面取得进展,并缩短住院时间(LoS)和降低死亡率。该项目旨在为脓毒症患者提供安全且一致的治疗路径,使脓毒症能够根据最佳实践得到及时识别和治疗。该项目的目的是了解在急诊科为严重脓毒症患者提供安全有效护理的障碍所在。项目团队使用由字节健康基金会和华威大学开发的更安全临床系统(SCS)工具,识别了脓毒症患者治疗路径中的危害和相关风险。所采用的分析水平使项目团队能够识别该治疗路径中的主要风险、主题和影响因素。分析确定了29种可能的干预措施,经过选项评估后选择了其中6种。作为商业案例的一部分,向急诊部门推荐了进一步的干预措施以及流程中的进一步更改。审计确定了2014年10月在急诊科就诊的所有严重脓毒症患者(n = 67)以及2015年9月干预后的患者(n = 93)。对比分析表明,脓毒症六项护理集束的实施依从性从7%提高到了41%,住院时间缩短了1.9天,30天死亡率降低了50%。在项目期间,额外的审计每周对10名脓毒症患者的管理情况进行审查,以评估所选干预措施的实时影响。