Good Hope Hospital, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton Coldfield B75 7RR, UK.
Emerg Med J. 2011 Jun;28(6):507-12. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.095067. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
Severe sepsis is likely to account for around 37,000 deaths annually in the UK. Five years after the international Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) care bundles were published, care standards in the management of patients with severe sepsis are achieved in fewer than one in seven patients.
This was a prospective observational cohort study across a 500-bed acute general hospital, to assess the delivery and impact of two interventions: the SSC resuscitation bundle and a new intervention designed to facilitate delivery, the sepsis six. Process measures included compliance with the bundle and the sepsis six; the outcome measure was mortality at hospital discharge.
Data from 567 patients were suitable for analysis. Compliance with the bundle increased from baseline. 84.6% of those receiving the sepsis six (n = 220) achieved the resuscitation bundle compared with only 5.8% of others. Delivery of the interventions had an association with reduced mortality: for the sepsis six (n = 220), 20.0% compared with 44.1% (p < 0.001); for the resuscitation bundle (n = 204), 5.9% compared with 51% (p < 0.001). Those receiving the sepsis six were much more likely to receive the full bundle. Those seen by the sepsis team had improved compliance with bundles and reduced mortality.
This study supports the SSC resuscitation bundle, and is suggestive of an association with reduced mortality although does not demonstrate causation. It demonstrates that simplified pathways, such as the sepsis six, and education programmes such as survive sepsis can contribute to improving the rate of delivery of these life-saving interventions.
在英国,每年有大约 37000 人死于严重脓毒症。在国际拯救脓毒症运动(SSC)护理包发布五年后,在管理严重脓毒症患者方面,达到护理标准的患者不足七分之一。
这是一项在一家拥有 500 张床位的急性综合医院进行的前瞻性观察性队列研究,旨在评估两项干预措施的实施和影响:SSC 复苏包和一项旨在促进实施的新干预措施,即脓毒症 6。过程测量包括遵守捆绑包和脓毒症 6;结果测量是出院时的死亡率。
共有 567 名患者的数据适合分析。捆绑包的依从性从基线开始增加。接受脓毒症 6 治疗的患者中,有 84.6%(n=220)达到复苏包,而其他患者只有 5.8%(n=220)。干预措施的实施与死亡率降低有关:对于脓毒症 6(n=220),20.0%,而对于其他患者,44.1%(p<0.001);对于复苏包(n=204),5.9%,而对于其他患者,51%(p<0.001)。接受脓毒症 6 治疗的患者更有可能接受完整的捆绑包。接受脓毒症小组治疗的患者,捆绑包的依从性提高,死亡率降低。
本研究支持 SSC 复苏包,并提示与死亡率降低有关,尽管不能证明因果关系。它表明,简化的途径,如脓毒症 6,以及教育计划,如生存脓毒症,可以有助于提高这些救命干预措施的实施率。