• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国西米德兰兹郡两家急症医院对脓毒症“六件套”护理包的依从情况快照

A Snapshot of Compliance with the Sepsis Six Care Bundle in Two Acute Hospitals in the West Midlands, UK.

作者信息

Frankling Catriona, Patel Jaimin, Sharif Ben, Melody Teresa, Yeung Joyce, Gao Fang, Szakmany Tamas

机构信息

Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;23(7):310-315. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23204.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23204
PMID:31406433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6686588/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The sepsis six care bundle has been adopted by hospitals in England and Wales for the management of patients with sepsis, with the aim of increasing survival when all elements of the bundle are achieved.

AIM

To assess compliance with the Sepsis Six Care Bundle in two acute NHS hospitals in the West Midlands.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults admitted to hospital over a 24-hour period were screened for sepsis. Sepsis was identified using the Systemic Inflammatory Response (SIRS) criteria and the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score. Adherence to the Sepsis Six Care Bundle was assessed.

RESULTS

249 patients were screened and 24 patients were identified as having sepsis (9.6%). One patient received all six elements of the bundle. Compliance was highest for giving intravenous fluids (58.3%) and antibiotics (58.3%), and lowest for measuring urine output (16.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is needed to establish the reasons for low compliance.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Frankling C, Patel J, Sharif B, Melody T, Yeung J, Gao F, et al. A Snapshot of Compliance with the Sepsis Six Care Bundle in Two Acute Hospitals in the West Midlands, UK. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23(7):310-315.

摘要

背景

英格兰和威尔士的医院已采用脓毒症六要素护理集束方案来管理脓毒症患者,目的是在实现集束方案的所有要素时提高生存率。

目的

评估西米德兰兹郡两家急性国民保健服务医院对脓毒症六要素护理集束方案的依从性。

材料与方法

对24小时内入院的成人进行脓毒症筛查。使用全身炎症反应(SIRS)标准和快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分来识别脓毒症。评估对脓毒症六要素护理集束方案的依从性。

结果

共筛查249例患者,其中24例被确定为患有脓毒症(9.6%)。1例患者接受了集束方案的所有六个要素。静脉输液(58.3%)和使用抗生素(58.3%)的依从性最高,测量尿量的依从性最低(16.7%)。

结论

需要进一步研究以确定依从性低的原因。

如何引用本文

Frankling C, Patel J, Sharif B, Melody T, Yeung J, Gao F,等。英国西米德兰兹郡两家急性医院对脓毒症六要素护理集束方案依从性的概况。《印度重症监护医学杂志》2019;23(7):310 - 315。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/288b/6686588/1e99c927d872/ijccm-23-310-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/288b/6686588/1e99c927d872/ijccm-23-310-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/288b/6686588/1e99c927d872/ijccm-23-310-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Snapshot of Compliance with the Sepsis Six Care Bundle in Two Acute Hospitals in the West Midlands, UK.英国西米德兰兹郡两家急症医院对脓毒症“六件套”护理包的依从情况快照
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;23(7):310-315. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23204.
2
Sepsis scoring systems and use of the Sepsis six care bundle in maternity hospitals.脓毒症评分系统和脓毒症六包在产科医院的使用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03921-3.
3
A Descriptive Study on Sepsis: Causes, Outcomes, and Adherence to Guidelines on Patients with Sepsis at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡一家三级护理医院关于脓毒症的描述性研究:病因、结局以及对脓毒症患者指南的遵循情况。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jul 15;2020:7971387. doi: 10.1155/2020/7971387. eCollection 2020.
4
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
5
Four consecutive yearly point-prevalence studies in Wales indicate lack of improvement in sepsis care on the wards.威尔士连续 4 年进行的年度时点患病率研究表明,病房中脓毒症护理并未得到改善。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 10;11(1):16222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95648-6.
6
Validation of prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among cardiac-, thoracic-, and vascular-surgery patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit.入住心胸重症监护病房的心脏、胸科和血管手术患者中,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准及快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分对院内死亡率预后准确性的验证。
J Card Surg. 2020 Jan;35(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14331. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
7
Role of Presepsin for the Diagnosis of Sepsis and ICU Mortality: A Prospective Controlled Study.前降钙素原在脓毒症诊断及重症监护病房死亡率评估中的作用:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb;25(2):153-157. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23715.
8
Evaluating the impact of severe sepsis 3-hour bundle compliance on 28-day in-hospital mortality: A propensity adjusted, nested case-control study.评价严重脓毒症 3 小时bundle 依从性对 28 天住院病死率的影响:倾向评分调整的嵌套病例对照研究。
Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Aug;42(8):651-658. doi: 10.1002/phar.2715. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
9
Implementing a quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment sepsis screening tool: an interrupted times series study.实施快速序贯(脓毒症相关)器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)脓毒症筛查工具:一项中断时间序列研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jul 20;32(6):388-395. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa059.
10
Early recognition of sepsis through emergency medical services pre-hospital screening.通过急救医疗服务院前筛查早期识别脓毒症。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1428-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.036. Epub 2018 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing the Sepsis Six Care Bundle (BLISS-1) Questionnaire.实施脓毒症“六步法”护理集束方案(BLISS - 1)问卷的障碍与促进因素的心理测量学特性
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 May 27;18:1761-1771. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S517386. eCollection 2025.
2
Mapping decision-making pathways: Determination of intervention entry points for diagnostic tests in suspected serious infection.绘制决策路径:确定疑似严重感染中诊断检测的干预切入点。
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Jan 17;4:35. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13568.2. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with sepsis identified by the Sepsis-3 criteria by blood and urine culture results: A multicentre retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Red-flag sepsis and SOFA identifies different patient population at risk of sepsis-related deaths on the general ward.红色警示脓毒症和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在普通病房中识别出不同的脓毒症相关死亡风险患者群体。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(49):e13238. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013238.
2
Sepsis-related deaths in the at-risk population on the wards: attributable fraction of mortality in a large point-prevalence study.病房中高危人群的脓毒症相关死亡:一项大型现况调查研究中的死亡归因比例
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Oct 11;11(1):720. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3819-2.
3
Improving outcome of sepsis on the ward: introducing the 'Sepsis Six' bundle.
根据血培养和尿培养结果,采用Sepsis-3标准识别的脓毒症患者的临床特征与预后比较:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 19;7(6):e2162. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2162. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Sepsis outcomes in patients with pre-existing liver disease.患有基础肝病患者的脓毒症结局
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2021 Dec;7(4):358-363. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2021.111421. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
5
Four consecutive yearly point-prevalence studies in Wales indicate lack of improvement in sepsis care on the wards.威尔士连续 4 年进行的年度时点患病率研究表明,病房中脓毒症护理并未得到改善。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 10;11(1):16222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95648-6.
6
Sepsis scoring systems and use of the Sepsis six care bundle in maternity hospitals.脓毒症评分系统和脓毒症六包在产科医院的使用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03921-3.
改善病房中脓毒症的预后:引入“Sepsis Six”集束化治疗方案。
Nurs Crit Care. 2019 Jan;24(1):33-39. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12358. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
4
Defining sepsis on the wards: results of a multi-centre point-prevalence study comparing two sepsis definitions.病房中脓毒症的定义:一项多中心时点患病率研究比较两种脓毒症定义的结果。
Anaesthesia. 2018 Feb;73(2):195-204. doi: 10.1111/anae.14062. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
5
Epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock in critical care units: comparison between sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 populations using a national critical care database.重症监护病房脓毒症和脓毒性休克的流行病学:使用国家重症监护数据库比较脓毒症-2 人群和脓毒症-3 人群。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Oct 1;119(4):626-636. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex234.
6
Implementation of sepsis bundles in public hospitals in Brazil: a prospective study with heterogeneous results.巴西公立医院中脓毒症治疗包的实施:一项具有异质性结果的前瞻性研究。
Crit Care. 2017 Oct 31;21(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1858-z.
7
Harmful Effects of Hyperoxia in Postcardiac Arrest, Sepsis, Traumatic Brain Injury, or Stroke: The Importance of Individualized Oxygen Therapy in Critically Ill Patients.高氧对心脏骤停后、脓毒症、创伤性脑损伤或中风患者的有害影响:个体化氧疗在重症患者中的重要性
Can Respir J. 2017;2017:2834956. doi: 10.1155/2017/2834956. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
8
Sepsis Prevalence and Outcome on the General Wards and Emergency Departments in Wales: Results of a Multi-Centre, Observational, Point Prevalence Study.威尔士综合病房和急诊科的脓毒症患病率及转归:一项多中心、观察性、时点患病率研究的结果
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0167230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167230. eCollection 2016.
9
Making the journey safe: recognising and responding to severe sepsis in accident and emergency.保障旅途安全:在急诊中识别并应对严重脓毒症
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Sep 19;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u210706.w4335. eCollection 2016.
10
Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit.快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估、全身炎症反应综合征及早期预警评分用于检测重症监护病房以外感染患者的临床病情恶化
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 1;195(7):906-911. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0854OC.