Fader Amanda N, Xu Tim, Dunkin Brian J, Makary Martin A
Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4665-4667. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5170-9. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
Surgery is one of the highest priced services in health care, and complications from surgery can be serious and costly. Recently, advances in surgical techniques have allowed surgeons to perform many common operations using minimally invasive methods that result in fewer complications. Despite this, the rates of open surgery remain high across multiple surgical disciplines.
This is an expert commentary and review of the contemporary literature regarding minimally invasive surgery practices nationwide, the benefits of less invasive approaches, and how minimally invasive compared with open procedures are differentially reimbursed in the United States. We explore the incentive of the current surgeon reimbursement fee schedule and its potential implications.
A surgeon's preference to perform minimally invasive compared with open surgery remains highly variable in the U.S., even after adjustment for patient comorbidities and surgical complexity. Nationwide administrative claims data across several surgical disciplines demonstrates that minimally invasive surgery utilization in place of open surgery is associated with reduced adverse events and cost savings. Reducing surgical complications by increasing adoption of minimally invasive operations has significant cost implications for health care. However, current U.S. payment structures may perversely incentivize open surgery and financially reward physicians who do not necessarily embrace newer or best minimally invasive surgery practices.
Utilization of minimally invasive surgery varies considerably in the U.S., representing one of the greatest disparities in health care. Existing physician payment models must translate the growing body of research in surgical care into physician-level rewards for quality, including choice of operation. Promoting safe surgery should be an important component of a strong, value-based healthcare system. Resolving the potentially perverse incentives in paying for surgical approaches may help address disparities in surgical care, reduce the prevalent problem of variation, and help contain health care costs.
手术是医疗保健中价格最高的服务之一,手术并发症可能很严重且成本高昂。最近,手术技术的进步使外科医生能够使用微创方法进行许多常见手术,从而减少并发症。尽管如此,在多个外科领域,开放手术的比例仍然很高。
这是一篇专家评论,回顾了关于全国范围内微创手术实践、微创方法的益处以及在美国微创与开放手术相比如何差异化报销的当代文献。我们探讨了当前外科医生报销费用表的激励措施及其潜在影响。
在美国,即使在调整患者合并症和手术复杂性之后,外科医生对进行微创与开放手术的偏好仍然高度可变。多个外科领域的全国行政索赔数据表明,用微创手术替代开放手术与不良事件减少和成本节约相关。通过增加微创手术的采用来减少手术并发症对医疗保健有重大成本影响。然而,美国目前的支付结构可能会反常地激励开放手术,并在经济上奖励那些不一定采用更新或最佳微创手术实践的医生。
微创手术的使用在美国差异很大,这是医疗保健中最大的差异之一。现有的医生支付模式必须将外科护理方面不断增加的研究成果转化为对质量的医生层面奖励,包括手术选择。促进安全手术应该是强大的基于价值的医疗保健系统的重要组成部分。解决手术方法支付中潜在的反常激励措施可能有助于解决手术护理中的差异,减少普遍存在的变异问题,并有助于控制医疗保健成本。