Chen Meixue, Xia Jumei, Pei Guangchang, Zhang Ying, Wu Shuting, Qin Yushuang, Deng Yuanjun, Guo Shuiming, Guo Yanyan, Xu Gang, Han Min
Division of Nephrology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China.
Division of nuclear medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
BMC Nephrol. 2016 Oct 18;17(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0345-0.
Researchers have developed several equations to predict glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients with chronic kidney diseases (CKD). However, there are scarcely any studies performed to discern the best equation to estimate GFR in patients with pure obstructive nephropathy. In present study, we assessed the suitability of six prediction equations and compared their performance in eGFR evaluation for Chinese patients with obstructive nephropathy.
A total of 245 adult patients with obstructive nephropathy were enrolled. We evaluated the performance of the 3 Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations (MDRD) (the original MDRD7, 7MDRD; the abbreviated MDRD, aMDRD; and re-expressed abbreviated MDRD, re-aMDRD) and 3 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations (CKD-EPI) (CKD-EPI equation based on creatinine alone, CKD-EPIcr; CKD-EPI equation based on cystatin C alone, CKD-EPIcys; CKD-EPI equation based on combined creatinine-cystatin, CKD-EPIcr-cys). The measured GFR (mGFR) by mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method was used as the reference GFR.
The mean age of the study population was 51.61 ± 14.17 and 131 were male (53.47 %). The mean measured GFR was 66.54 ± 23.99 ml/min/1.73 m. Overall, the CKD-EPIcr-cys equation gave the best performance with the best correlation (R = 0.72) and agreement (-34.87, 40.83). CKD-EPIcr-cys equation also exhibited the highest accuracy (69.39 %, P < 0.01) and diagnostic efficacy (ROC = 0.874) with the smallest bias (2.98, P < 0.01). In the subgroup of the lowest GFR, CKD-EPIcys equation exhibited the highest accuracy (52.69 %) and the smallest bias (0.27). In the youngest age subgroup, CKD-EPIcys equation had the highest accuracy (71.64 %) and the smallest bias (-1.24). In other subgroups stratified by GFR, age and gender, CKD-EPIcr-cys equation remained the best performance.
The 3 CKD-EPI equations performed better than the 3 MDRD equations in estimating GFR in Chinese obstructive nephropathy patients; while the CKD-EPI equation based on combined creatinine-cystatin C provided the best estimation of GFR.
研究人员已开发出多种方程来预测慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的肾小球滤过率(GFR)。然而,几乎没有研究来辨别用于估计单纯性梗阻性肾病患者GFR的最佳方程。在本研究中,我们评估了六个预测方程的适用性,并比较了它们在评估中国梗阻性肾病患者eGFR方面的表现。
共纳入245例成年梗阻性肾病患者。我们评估了3种肾脏病饮食改良方程(MDRD)(原始MDRD7,7MDRD;简化MDRD,aMDRD;重新表达的简化MDRD,re-aMDRD)和3种慢性肾脏病流行病学协作方程(CKD-EPI)(仅基于肌酐的CKD-EPI方程,CKD-EPIcr;仅基于胱抑素C的CKD-EPI方程,CKD-EPIcys;基于肌酐-胱抑素联合的CKD-EPI方程,CKD-EPIcr-cys)的表现。采用99mTc-DTPA肾动态显像法测得的GFR(mGFR)作为参考GFR。
研究人群的平均年龄为51.61±14.17岁,男性131例(53.47%)。测得的平均GFR为66.54±23.99ml/min/1.73m²。总体而言,CKD-EPIcr-cys方程表现最佳,相关性最好(R=0.72),一致性最佳(-34.87,40.83)。CKD-EPIcr-cys方程还表现出最高的准确性(69.39%,P<0.01)和诊断效能(ROC=0.874),偏差最小(2.98,P<0.01)。在GFR最低的亚组中,CKD-EPIcys方程表现出最高的准确性(52.69%)和最小的偏差(0.27)。在最年轻的年龄亚组中,CKD-EPIcys方程具有最高的准确性(71.64%)和最小的偏差(-1.24)。在按GFR、年龄和性别分层的其他亚组中,CKD-EPIcr-cys方程仍然表现最佳。
在估计中国梗阻性肾病患者的GFR方面,3种CKD-EPI方程比3种MDRD方程表现更好;而基于肌酐-胱抑素C联合的CKD-EPI方程对GFR的估计最佳。