Kefyalew Takele, Kebede Zelalem, Getachew Dawit, Mukanga David, Awano Tessema, Tekalegne Agonafer, Batisso Esey, Edossa Wasihun, Mekonnen Emebet, Tibenderana James, Baba Ebenezer Sheshi, Shumba Constance, Nankabirwa Joaniter I, Hamade Prudence
Malaria Consortium Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Science and Health Impact Group, Kampala, Uganda.
Malar J. 2016 Oct 18;15(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1561-6.
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends injectable artesunate given either intravenously or by the intramuscular route for definitive treatment for severe malaria and recommends a single intramuscular dose of intramuscular artesunate or intramuscular artemether or intramuscular quinine, in that order of preference as pre-referral treatment when definitive treatment is not possible. Where intramuscular injections are not available, children under 6 years may be administered a single dose of rectal artesunate. Although the current malaria treatment guidelines in Ethiopia recommend intra-rectal artesunate or alternatively intramuscular artemether or intramuscular quinine as pre-referral treatment for severe malaria at the health posts, there are currently no WHO prequalified suppliers of intra-rectal artesunate and when available, its use is limited to children under 6 years of age leaving a gap for the older age groups. Intramuscular artesunate is not part of the drugs recommended for pre-referral treatment in Ethiopia. This study assessed the perspectives of health workers, and policy-makers on the use of intramuscular artesunate as a pre-referral and definitive treatment for severe malaria at the health post level.
In-depth interviews were held with 101 individuals including health workers, malaria focal persons, and Regional Health Bureaus from Oromia and southern nations, nationalities, and peoples' region, as well as participants from the Federal Ministry of Health and development partners. An interview guide was used in the data collection and thematic content analysis was employed for analysis.
Key findings from this study are: (1) provision of intramuscular artesunate as pre-referral and definitive treatment for severe malaria at health posts could be lifesaving; (2) with adequate training, and provision of facilities including beds, health posts can provide definitive treatment for severe malaria using intramuscular artesunate where referral is delayed or not possible; (3) health workers at health centres and hospitals frequently use the intravenous route because it allows for co-administration of other drugs, but they find the intramuscular route easier to use at the health post level; (4) the reasons commonly cited against the management of severe malaria using intramuscular artesunate at health post level were: lack of capacity to manage complications and fear of irrational drug use; (5) use of intramuscular artesunate at health post level will require evidence on safety and feasibility before policy shift.
From the perspective of health workers, use of intramuscular artesunate as pre-referral treatment of severe malaria cases at the health post is possible but dependent on training and availability of skilled workers. Use of intramuscular artesunate as definitive treatment at health posts was not supported, however, operational research to establish its feasibility, safety and efficacy was recommended to guide any implementation of such an intervention.
世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐采用静脉注射或肌肉注射青蒿琥酯对重症疟疾进行确定性治疗,并建议在无法进行确定性治疗时,按优先顺序先采用单剂量肌肉注射青蒿琥酯、肌肉注射蒿甲醚或肌肉注射奎宁进行转诊前治疗。若无法进行肌肉注射,6岁以下儿童可给予单剂量直肠用青蒿琥酯。尽管埃塞俄比亚目前的疟疾治疗指南推荐在卫生所采用直肠用青蒿琥酯,或者选用肌肉注射蒿甲醚或肌肉注射奎宁作为重症疟疾的转诊前治疗方法,但目前尚无WHO预认证的直肠用青蒿琥酯供应商,即便有货,其使用也仅限于6岁以下儿童,这使得大龄组存在治疗空白。肌肉注射青蒿琥酯并非埃塞俄比亚推荐用于转诊前治疗的药物。本研究评估了卫生工作者和政策制定者对于在卫生所层面将肌肉注射青蒿琥酯用作重症疟疾转诊前和确定性治疗方法的看法。
对101人进行了深入访谈,包括卫生工作者(疟疾防治专员)、奥罗米亚州以及南方各族州和民族地区的区域卫生局人员,还有联邦卫生部和发展伙伴的参与者。数据收集过程中使用了访谈指南,并采用主题内容分析法进行分析。
本研究的主要发现如下:(1)在卫生所提供肌肉注射青蒿琥酯作为重症疟疾的转诊前和确定性治疗方法可能会挽救生命;(2)通过充分培训并提供包括床位在内的设施,在转诊延迟或无法转诊的情况下,卫生所能够使用肌肉注射青蒿琥酯对重症疟疾进行确定性治疗;(3)卫生中心和医院的卫生工作者经常采用静脉注射途径,因为这样可以同时使用其他药物,但他们发现在卫生所层面肌肉注射途径更易于操作;(4)在卫生所层面,普遍反对使用肌肉注射青蒿琥酯治疗重症疟疾的原因是:缺乏处理并发症的能力以及担心不合理用药;(5)在卫生所层面使用肌肉注射青蒿琥酯,在政策转变之前需要有关于安全性和可行性的证据。
从卫生工作者的角度来看,在卫生所将肌肉注射青蒿琥酯用作重症疟疾病例的转诊前治疗是可行的,但这取决于培训情况和技术熟练的工作人员的可获得性。不过,不支持在卫生所将肌肉注射青蒿琥酯用作确定性治疗,建议开展运筹学研究以确定其可行性、安全性和有效性,从而指导此类干预措施的实施。