Cadman Joseph, Sutterlin Chester, Dabirrahmani Danè, Appleyard Richard
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Group, Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.
University of Florida, FL, USA;; Spinal Health International, 511 Putter Lane, Longboat Key, FL, USA.
J Spine Surg. 2016 Sep;2(3):178-184. doi: 10.21037/jss.2016.09.08.
Commercial fusion cages typically provide support in the central region of the endplate, failing to utilize the increased compressive strength around the periphery. This study demonstrates the increase in compressive strength that can be achieved if the bony periphery of the endplate is loaded.
Sixteen cadaveric lumbar vertebrae (L1-L5) were randomly divided into two even groups. A different commercial mass produced implant (MPI) was allocated to each group: (I) a Polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) anterior lumber inter-body fusion (ALIF) MPI; and (II) a titanium ALIF MPI. Uniaxial compression at a displacement rate of 0.5 mm/sec was applied to all vertebrae during two phases: (I) with the allocated MPI situated in the central region of the endplate; (II) with an aluminum plate, designed to load the bony periphery of the endplate. The failure load and mode of failure was recorded.
From phase 1 to phase 2, the failure load increased from 1.1±0.4 to 2.9±1.4 kN for group 1; and from 1.3±1.0 to 3.0±1.9 kN for group 2. The increase in strength from phase 1 to phase 2 was statistically significant for each group (group 1: P<0.01, group 2: P<0.05, paired -test). There was no significant difference between the groups in either phase (P>0.05, -test). The mode of failure in phase 1 was the implant being forced through the endplate for both groups. In phase 2, the mode of failure was either a fracture of the epiphyseal rim or buckling of the side wall of the vertebral body.
Loading the periphery of the vertebral endplate achieved significant increase in compressive load capacity compared to loading the central region of the endplate. Clinically, this implies that patient-specific implants which load the periphery of the vertebral endplate could decrease the incidence of subsidence and improve surgical outcomes.
市售融合器通常在终板中央区域提供支撑,未能利用周边区域增加的抗压强度。本研究证明,如果加载终板的骨质周边区域,抗压强度会增加。
将16具尸体腰椎(L1-L5)随机分为两组。每组分配一种不同的市售量产植入物(MPI):(I)聚醚醚酮(PEEK)前路腰椎椎间融合(ALIF)MPI;(II)钛质ALIF MPI。在两个阶段对所有椎体施加0.5毫米/秒位移速率的单轴压缩:(I)将分配的MPI置于终板中央区域;(II)使用一块设计用于加载终板骨质周边区域的铝板。记录失效载荷和失效模式。
从第1阶段到第2阶段,第1组的失效载荷从1.1±0.4千牛增加到2.9±l.4千牛;第2组从1.3±1.0千牛增加到3.0±1.9千牛。每组从第1阶段到第2阶段的强度增加具有统计学意义(第1组:P<0.01,第2组:P<0.05,配对检验)。两组在任一阶段均无显著差异(P>0.05,检验)。第1阶段两组的失效模式均为植入物被压穿终板。在第2阶段,失效模式为骨骺边缘骨折或椎体侧壁屈曲。
与加载终板中央区域相比,加载椎体终板周边区域可显著提高抗压负荷能力。临床上,这意味着加载椎体终板周边区域的定制植入物可降低下沉发生率并改善手术效果。