Suppr超能文献

腹疝修补术中粘连预防:一项比较三种推荐用于腹腔内使用的轻质多孔补片的实验研究。

Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use.

作者信息

D'Amore L, Ceci F, Mattia S, Fabbi M, Negro P, Gossetti F

机构信息

Department of Surgery P.Stefanini, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

School of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Hernia. 2017 Feb;21(1):115-123. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1541-3. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In ventral hernia repair, when prosthetic material is placed intraperitoneally, it may lead to an inflammatory reaction resulting in adhesions between the mesh and abdominal viscera. Several meshes have been developed to minimize this process. In this experimental study, the ability of different combined meshes to attenuate the adhesion formation was examined.

METHODS

Three commercially available lightweight porous combined meshes were placed intraperitoneally to repair an abdominal wall defect in rats: DynaMesh-IPOM (PVDF + PP), TiMesh (titanium-coated filament PP) and C-QUR/FX (omega-3 fatty acid-coated filament PP). The DynaMesh-CICAT (PVDF) was implanted in the control group. Adhesion formation was macroscopically evaluated and scored after 7 and 21 days.

RESULTS

All animals except two presented intra-abdominal adhesions. None of the meshes examined in the study demonstrated to prevent adhesions. C-QUR/FX reduced adhesion formation at 7 days' follow-up compared with all other meshes but by 21 days this effect was diminished. Between 7 and 21 days adhesion extension significantly decreased for TiMesh. TAS did not show significant modifications between 7 and 21 days' follow-up for each mesh.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined porous meshes tested in the present study demonstrated to reduce but not to prevent the adhesion formation, even if with some differences. Combined porous meshes could be chosen instead of simple meshes for retro-rectus preperitoneal prosthetic ventral hernia repair.

摘要

背景

在腹疝修补术中,当将人工合成材料放置于腹腔内时,可能会引发炎症反应,导致补片与腹腔脏器之间形成粘连。已经研发出多种补片以尽量减少这一过程。在本实验研究中,检测了不同复合补片减轻粘连形成的能力。

方法

将三种市售的轻质多孔复合补片放置于大鼠腹腔内以修复腹壁缺损:DynaMesh-IPOM(聚偏二氟乙烯+聚丙烯)、TiMesh(钛涂层丝聚丙烯)和C-QUR/FX(ω-3脂肪酸涂层丝聚丙烯)。对照组植入DynaMesh-CICAT(聚偏二氟乙烯)。在术后7天和21天对粘连形成情况进行宏观评估并评分。

结果

除两只动物外,所有动物均出现腹腔内粘连。研究中检测的所有补片均未显示出能预防粘连。与所有其他补片相比,C-QUR/FX在7天随访时减少了粘连形成,但到21天时这种效果减弱。TiMesh在7至21天之间粘连扩展明显减少。每种补片在7至21天随访期间TAS均未显示出显著变化。

结论

本研究中测试的复合多孔补片显示出可减少但不能预防粘连形成,即使存在一些差异。对于经腹直肌腹膜前人工合成材料修补腹疝,可选择复合多孔补片而非单纯补片。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验