Suppr超能文献

用于腹疝修补的新型人工补片的评估

Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair.

作者信息

Burger J W A, Halm J A, Wijsmuller A R, ten Raa S, Jeekel J

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2006 Aug;20(8):1320-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0706-4. Epub 2006 Jul 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In hernia repair, particularly laparoscopic hernia repair, direct contact between mesh and abdominal organs cannot always be avoided. Several mesh materials and composite meshes have been developed to decrease subsequent adhesion formation. Recently, new meshes have been introduced. In an experimental rat study, their value was established and compared with that of meshes already available on the market.

METHODS

In 200 rats, eight different meshes were placed intraperitoneally and in direct contact with abdominal viscera. The following meshes were tested: polypropylene (Prolene), e-PTFE (Dualmesh), polypropylene- polyglecaprone composite (Ultrapro), titanium-polypropylene composite (Timesh), polypropylene with carboxymethylcellulose-sodium hyaluronate coating (Sepramesh), polyester with collagen-polyethylene glycol-glycerol coating (Parietex Composite), polypropylene-polydioxanone composite with oxidized cellulose coating (Proceed), and bovine pericardium (Tutomesh). At 7 and then at 30 days postoperatively, adhesion formation, mesh incorporation, tensile strength, shrinkage, and infection were scored by two independent observers.

RESULTS

Parietex Composite, Sepramesh, and Tutomesh resulted in decreased surface coverage with adhesions, whereas Prolene, Dualmesh, Ultrapro, Timesh, and Proceed resulted in increased adhesion coverage. Parietex Composite, Prolene, Ultrapro, and Sepramesh resulted in the most mesh incorporation. Dualmesh and Tutomesh resulted in significantly increased shrinkage. There were no differences in mesh infection. Parietex Composite and Dualmesh resulted in a moderate inflammatory reaction, as compared with the mild reaction the other meshes exhibited.

CONCLUSION

Parietex Composite and Sepramesh combine minimal adhesion formation with maximum mesh incorporation and tensile strength. The authors recommend the use of these meshes for hernia repair in which direct contact with the abdominal viscera cannot be avoided.

摘要

背景

在疝修补术中,尤其是腹腔镜疝修补术,补片与腹腔脏器之间的直接接触有时难以避免。人们已研发出多种补片材料及复合补片,以减少术后粘连的形成。近来,新型补片问世。在一项大鼠实验研究中,对这些新型补片的性能进行了评估,并与市面上现有的补片作比较。

方法

选取200只大鼠,将8种不同补片置于腹腔内并使其与腹腔脏器直接接触。所测试的补片如下:聚丙烯补片(普理灵)、e-PTFE补片(双网补片)、聚丙烯-聚甘醇酸复合补片(超普)、钛-聚丙烯复合补片(泰适)、带有羧甲基纤维素-透明质酸钠涂层的聚丙烯补片(善释)、带有胶原-聚乙二醇-甘油涂层的聚酯补片(百达智康复合补片)、带有氧化纤维素涂层的聚丙烯-聚二氧六环酮复合补片(普赛因德)以及牛心包补片(图托美什)。术后7天及30天时,由两名独立观察者对粘连形成、补片植入、拉伸强度、收缩情况及感染情况进行评分。

结果

百达智康复合补片、善释及图托美什补片致使粘连覆盖面积减少,而普理灵、双网补片、超普、泰适及普赛因德补片则使粘连覆盖面积增加。百达智康复合补片、普理灵、超普及善释补片的补片植入情况最佳。双网补片及图托美什补片的收缩情况显著增加。补片感染情况无差异。与其他补片所引发的轻度炎症反应相比,百达智康复合补片及双网补片引发的是中度炎症反应。

结论

百达智康复合补片和善释补片在粘连形成最少的同时,补片植入及拉伸强度最大。作者建议,在无法避免补片与腹腔脏器直接接触的疝修补术中,使用这些补片。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验