Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, M6J 1H4, Canada.
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Jan;46(1):197-212. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0578-z. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
In light of its associations with child and adolescent health and well-being, there remains a need to better understand the etiological underpinnings and developmental course of internalizing symptomatology in children and adolescents. This study leveraged intensive longitudinal data (N = 959; 49.6 % females) to test the hypothesis that internalizing symptoms in childhood may be driven more strongly by family experiences whereas internalizing symptoms in adolescence may derive more uniquely from familial loading for affective disorders (i.e., maternal depression). We evaluated the relative contributions of (a) family experiences (b) maternal depression, and (c) peer influences in testing this hypothesis. The results indicated that family predictors were more strongly correlated with childhood (relative to adolescent) internalizing symptoms. In contrast to previous findings, maternal depression also exhibited stronger associations with childhood internalizing symptoms. Although often overlooked in theories concerning potential differential origins of childhood vs. adolescent internalizing symptomatology, peer experiences explained unique variation in both childhood and adolescent internalizing problems.
鉴于其与儿童和青少年健康和幸福感的关联,仍有必要更好地了解儿童和青少年内化症状的病因基础和发展过程。本研究利用密集的纵向数据(N=959;49.6%为女性)来检验以下假设:儿童时期的内化症状可能更多地受到家庭经历的驱动,而青少年时期的内化症状可能更多地源于情感障碍的家族负荷(即母亲抑郁)。我们评估了(a)家庭经历、(b)母亲抑郁和(c)同伴影响在检验这一假设中的相对贡献。结果表明,家庭预测因素与儿童(相对于青少年)内化症状的相关性更强。与先前的研究结果相反,母亲抑郁也与儿童内化症状有更强的关联。尽管在关于儿童与青少年内化症状潜在不同起源的理论中经常被忽视,但同伴经历解释了儿童和青少年内化问题的独特变化。