Mirosław-Świątek Dorota, Michałowski Robert, Szporak-Wasilewska Sylwia, Ignar Stefan, Grygoruk Mateusz
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, ul. Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Water Centre Laboratory, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Ciszewskiego 6, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Nov;188(11):625. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5642-3. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
In our study, we analyzed the combined standard uncertainty of water table slope assessment done using differential global positioning system (DGPS)-based measurements of water table elevation and distances between measurement locations. We compared and discussed uncertainties in water table slope assessments done in various hypothetical environments of lowland floodplains (water table slopes typically ranged from 1.25 · 10 to 1 · 10). Our analyses referred to elevation measurements done with the static GPS and DGPS real-time kinematic (RTK) approaches, which are currently among the most frequently used elevation measurement techniques worldwide. Calculations of the combined standard uncertainty of water table slope allowed us to conclude that the DGPS-RTK approach used in water table slope assessment can result in assessment errors as high as 50 % at short (<200 m) distances. Acceptable water table slope measurement errors (lower than 5 %) occur at distances longer than 11,320 m in the case of DGPS-RTK measurements, while, in the case of static GPS measurements, acceptable measurement errors at the same level occur at distances as low as 1350 m. Errors in water table slope assessment as high as 50 % occur at distances of 1130 m and 140 m for DGPS-RTK and static GPS measurements, respectively. We conclude that, although the DGPS-RTK methodology-due to its ease of use and time-saving capabilities is very often applied to water level measurements in lowland riparian wetlands, the application of the DGPS-RTK methodology for water table slope assessment at distances shorter than a few couples of meters results in very low accuracy (errors greater than 50 %) and should not be used for calculating local slopes in low slope areas such as lowland riparian zones.
在我们的研究中,我们分析了使用基于差分全球定位系统(DGPS)的地下水位高程测量和测量地点之间的距离来评估地下水位坡度的合成标准不确定度。我们比较并讨论了在低地洪泛平原的各种假设环境中进行的地下水位坡度评估中的不确定度(地下水位坡度通常范围为1.25·10至1·10)。我们的分析参考了使用静态GPS和DGPS实时动态(RTK)方法进行的高程测量,这两种方法目前是全球最常用的高程测量技术。地下水位坡度合成标准不确定度的计算使我们得出结论,在地下水位坡度评估中使用的DGPS-RTK方法在短距离(<200米)时可能导致高达50%的评估误差。对于DGPS-RTK测量,在距离超过11320米时会出现可接受的地下水位坡度测量误差(低于5%),而对于静态GPS测量,在低至1350米的距离时会出现相同水平的可接受测量误差。对于DGPS-RTK和静态GPS测量,在距离分别为1130米和140米时,地下水位坡度评估误差高达50%。我们得出结论,尽管DGPS-RTK方法因其易用性和节省时间的能力而经常应用于低地河岸湿地的水位测量,但在距离短于几十米的情况下,将DGPS-RTK方法应用于地下水位坡度评估会导致非常低的精度(误差大于50%),不应将其用于计算低坡度区域(如低地河岸带)的局部坡度。