Still Ruth, Marais Debbie, Hollis Jenna Louise
Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
The Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Jul;13(3). doi: 10.1111/mcn.12336. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
There is a lack of knowledge and understanding of the term exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) among health professionals. The purpose of this review was to examine the best available literature on mothers' understanding of the term EBF. A systematic search of eight electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, CDSR, CENTRAL, Cab Abstracts, Scopus and African Index Medicus) was conducted (Protocol registration in PROSPERO: CRD42015019402). All study designs were eligible for inclusion. Studies were included if they: (1) involved mothers aged 18 years or older; (2) assessed mothers' knowledge/understanding/awareness of the term 'EBF'; (3) used the 1991 WHO definition of EBF and (4) were published between 1988 and 2015. Two reviewers retrieved articles, assessed study quality and performed data extraction. Of the 1700 articles identified, 21 articles met the inclusion criteria. Quantitative findings were pooled to calculate a proportion rate of 70.9% of mothers who could correctly define EBF, although the range varied between 3.1 and 100%. Qualitative findings revealed three themes: (1) EBF was understood by mothers as not mixing two milks; (2) the term 'exclusive' in EBF was incorrectly understood as not giving breast milk and (3) mothers believing that water can be given while exclusively breastfeeding. Research investigating aspects of self-reported EBF may consequently be unreliable. A standardised tool to assess mothers' knowledge of EBF could provide more accurate data. Public health campaigns should emphasise EBF to target mothers, while addressing the education of health professionals to ensure that they do not provide conflicting advice.
卫生专业人员对纯母乳喂养(EBF)这一术语缺乏了解。本综述的目的是研究关于母亲对纯母乳喂养这一术语理解的现有最佳文献。我们对八个电子数据库(医学索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库、考科蓝系统评价数据库、考科蓝对照试验中心注册库、国际农业与生物科学研究中心数据库、Scopus数据库和非洲医学索引数据库)进行了系统检索(在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库中的注册号:CRD42015019402)。所有研究设计均符合纳入标准。符合以下条件的研究被纳入:(1)涉及18岁及以上的母亲;(2)评估母亲对“纯母乳喂养”这一术语的知识/理解/认知;(3)采用1991年世界卫生组织对纯母乳喂养的定义;(4)发表于1988年至2015年之间。两名评审员检索文章、评估研究质量并进行数据提取。在检索到的1700篇文章中,有21篇符合纳入标准。对定量研究结果进行汇总后计算得出,能够正确定义纯母乳喂养的母亲比例为70.9%,尽管该比例在3.1%至100%之间有所不同。定性研究结果揭示了三个主题:(1)母亲们将纯母乳喂养理解为不混合两种乳汁;(2)纯母乳喂养中的“纯”字被错误地理解为不喂母乳;(3)母亲们认为在纯母乳喂养期间可以喂水。因此,关于自我报告的纯母乳喂养方面的研究可能不可靠。一种评估母亲对纯母乳喂养知识的标准化工具可以提供更准确的数据。公共卫生运动应向母亲们强调纯母乳喂养,同时对卫生专业人员进行教育,以确保他们不会给出相互矛盾的建议。