Suppr超能文献

为有健康足月儿的健康母乳喂养母亲提供支持。

Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.

作者信息

McFadden Alison, Gavine Anna, Renfrew Mary J, Wade Angela, Buchanan Phyll, Taylor Jane L, Veitch Emma, Rennie Anne Marie, Crowther Susan A, Neiman Sara, MacGillivray Stephen

机构信息

Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Dundee, 11 Airlie Place, Dundee, Tayside, UK, DD1 4HJ.

evidence Synthesis Training and Research Group (eSTAR), School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Dundee, 11 Airlie Place, Dundee, UK, DD1 4HJ.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 28;2(2):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is extensive evidence of important health risks for infants and mothers related to not breastfeeding. In 2003, the World Health Organization recommended that infants be breastfed exclusively until six months of age, with breastfeeding continuing as an important part of the infant's diet until at least two years of age. However, current breastfeeding rates in many countries do not reflect this recommendation.

OBJECTIVES

To describe forms of breastfeeding support which have been evaluated in controlled studies, the timing of the interventions and the settings in which they have been used.To examine the effectiveness of different modes of offering similar supportive interventions (for example, whether the support offered was proactive or reactive, face-to-face or over the telephone), and whether interventions containing both antenatal and postnatal elements were more effective than those taking place in the postnatal period alone.To examine the effectiveness of different care providers and (where information was available) training.To explore the interaction between background breastfeeding rates and effectiveness of support.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (29 February 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing extra support for healthy breastfeeding mothers of healthy term babies with usual maternity care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

This updated review includes 100 trials involving more than 83,246 mother-infant pairs of which 73 studies contribute data (58 individually-randomised trials and 15 cluster-randomised trials). We considered that the overall risk of bias of trials included in the review was mixed. Of the 31 new studies included in this update, 21 provided data for one or more of the primary outcomes. The total number of mother-infant pairs in the 73 studies that contributed data to this review is 74,656 (this total was 56,451 in the previous version of this review). The 73 studies were conducted in 29 countries. Results of the analyses continue to confirm that all forms of extra support analyzed together showed a decrease in cessation of 'any breastfeeding', which includes partial and exclusive breastfeeding (average risk ratio (RR) for stopping any breastfeeding before six months 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 0.95; moderate-quality evidence, 51 studies) and for stopping breastfeeding before four to six weeks (average RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.95; moderate-quality evidence, 33 studies). All forms of extra support together also showed a decrease in cessation of exclusive breastfeeding at six months (average RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.92; moderate-quality evidence, 46 studies) and at four to six weeks (average RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.89; moderate quality, 32 studies). We downgraded evidence to moderate-quality due to very high heterogeneity.We investigated substantial heterogeneity for all four outcomes with subgroup analyses for the following covariates: who delivered care, type of support, timing of support, background breastfeeding rate and number of postnatal contacts. Covariates were not able to explain heterogeneity in general. Though the interaction tests were significant for some analyses, we advise caution in the interpretation of results for subgroups due to the heterogeneity. Extra support by both lay and professionals had a positive impact on breastfeeding outcomes. Several factors may have also improved results for women practising exclusive breastfeeding, such as interventions delivered with a face-to-face component, high background initiation rates of breastfeeding, lay support, and a specific schedule of four to eight contacts. However, because within-group heterogeneity remained high for all of these analyses, we advise caution when making specific conclusions based on subgroup results. We noted no evidence for subgroup differences for the any breastfeeding outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: When breastfeeding support is offered to women, the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding is increased. Characteristics of effective support include: that it is offered as standard by trained personnel during antenatal or postnatal care, that it includes ongoing scheduled visits so that women can predict when support will be available, and that it is tailored to the setting and the needs of the population group. Support is likely to be more effective in settings with high initiation rates. Support may be offered either by professional or lay/peer supporters, or a combination of both. Strategies that rely mainly on face-to-face support are more likely to succeed with women practising exclusive breastfeeding.

摘要

背景

有大量证据表明,不进行母乳喂养会给婴儿和母亲带来重大健康风险。2003年,世界卫生组织建议婴儿在六个月大之前进行纯母乳喂养,并将母乳喂养作为婴儿饮食的重要组成部分持续到至少两岁。然而,许多国家目前的母乳喂养率并未反映这一建议。

目的

描述在对照研究中评估过的母乳喂养支持形式、干预时机以及使用这些支持的环境。研究提供类似支持性干预的不同方式(例如,提供的支持是主动还是被动、面对面还是通过电话)的有效性,以及包含产前和产后因素的干预是否比仅在产后进行的干预更有效。研究不同护理提供者及(若有相关信息)培训的有效性。探讨背景母乳喂养率与支持效果之间的相互作用。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩试验注册库(2016年2月29日)以及检索到的研究的参考文献列表。

选择标准

随机或半随机对照试验,比较为健康足月儿的健康母乳喂养母亲提供的额外支持与常规产科护理。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估试验是否纳入及偏倚风险,提取数据并检查其准确性。使用GRADE方法评估证据质量。

主要结果

本次更新综述纳入100项试验,涉及超过83246对母婴,其中73项研究提供了数据(58项个体随机试验和15项整群随机试验)。我们认为纳入综述的试验总体偏倚风险不一。本次更新纳入的31项新研究中,21项为一个或多个主要结局提供了数据。为本综述提供数据的73项研究中的母婴对总数为74656对(本综述上一版本中为56451对)。这73项研究在29个国家进行。分析结果继续证实,综合分析所有形式的额外支持均显示“任何母乳喂养”(包括部分母乳喂养和纯母乳喂养)停止情况减少(六个月前停止任何母乳喂养的平均风险比(RR)为0.91,95%置信区间(CI)为0.88至0.95;中等质量证据,51项研究)以及四至六周前停止母乳喂养情况减少(平均RR为0.87,95%CI为0.80至0.95;中等质量证据,33项研究)。综合所有形式的额外支持还显示六个月时纯母乳喂养停止情况减少(平均RR为0.88,95%CI为0.85至0.92;中等质量证据,46项研究)以及四至六周时纯母乳喂养停止情况减少(平均RR为0.79,95%CI为0.71至0.89;中等质量,32项研究)。由于异质性非常高,我们将证据降级为中等质量。我们通过对以下协变量进行亚组分析,研究了所有四个结局的显著异质性:提供护理的人员、支持类型、支持时机、背景母乳喂养率和产后接触次数。协变量总体上无法解释异质性。尽管某些分析的交互检验具有显著性,但由于存在异质性,我们建议在解释亚组结果时谨慎。外行和专业人员提供的额外支持对母乳喂养结局均有积极影响。对于进行纯母乳喂养的女性,一些因素可能也改善了结果,例如包含面对面部分的干预、高背景母乳喂养起始率、外行支持以及四至八次接触的特定安排。然而,由于所有这些分析中的组内异质性仍然很高,我们建议在基于亚组结果得出具体结论时谨慎。我们未发现任何母乳喂养结局的亚组差异证据。

作者结论

当为女性提供母乳喂养支持时,母乳喂养的持续时间和纯母乳喂养率会增加。有效支持的特征包括:由经过培训的人员在产前或产后护理期间作为标准提供,包括持续的定期访视以便女性能够预测何时可获得支持,并且根据环境和人群组的需求进行调整。在起始率高的环境中,支持可能更有效。支持可由专业人员或外行/同伴支持者提供,或两者结合。主要依靠面对面支持的策略对进行纯母乳喂养的女性更有可能成功。

相似文献

1
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 28;2(2):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub5.
2
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 25;10(10):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub6.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
5
Breastfeeding education and support for women with twins or higher order multiples.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 28;2(2):CD012003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012003.pub2.
6
Antenatal corticosteroids prior to planned caesarean at term for improving neonatal outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 22;12(12):CD006614. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006614.pub4.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Iodine supplementation for women during the preconception, pregnancy and postpartum period.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 5;3(3):CD011761. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011761.pub2.
9
Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 14;2(2):CD001055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub5.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

引用本文的文献

3
Hospital-Based Perinatal Practices and Duration of Exclusive Breastfeeding in Mexican Mothers.
Children (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;12(8):1091. doi: 10.3390/children12081091.
4
Effect of Educational Program on Maternal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2025 Jul 1;13(3):168-179. doi: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2025.104707.2660. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Predictors of exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int Breastfeed J. 2025 Jul 2;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13006-025-00744-2.
8
Possible Factors Affecting Breast Milk Feeding Status Of Preterm Infants Monitored in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
Turk Arch Pediatr. 2025 May 2;60(2):280-288. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24265.
9
The role of nurses, midwives, and doulas on breastfeeding: changes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Apr 14;6:1469428. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1469428. eCollection 2025.
10
Breastfeeding: The Multifaceted Impact on Child Development and Maternal Well-Being.
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 11;17(8):1326. doi: 10.3390/nu17081326.

本文引用的文献

1
Breastfeeding education and support for women with twins or higher order multiples.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 28;2(2):CD012003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012003.pub2.
2
The effect of lactation educators implementing a telephone-based intervention among low-income Hispanics: A randomised trial.
Health Educ J. 2015 Jul;74(4):424-441. doi: 10.1177/0017896914542666. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
3
Impact of the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative on breastfeeding and child health outcomes: a systematic review.
Matern Child Nutr. 2016 Jul;12(3):402-17. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12294. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
4
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Innovative Postpartum Care Model for Mother-Baby Dyads.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0148520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148520. eCollection 2016.
5
Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):491-504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2.
6
Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect.
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7.
7
Effect of Pattern and Duration of Breastfeeding on the Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables among Preschool Children.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 4;11(2):e0148357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148357. eCollection 2016.
9
The Effect of Interactive Web-Based Monitoring on Breastfeeding Exclusivity, Intensity, and Duration in Healthy, Term Infants After Hospital Discharge.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;45(2):143-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2015.12.001. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验