Antonelli Jodi A, Beardsley Heather, Faddegon Stephen, Morgan Monica S C, Gahan Jeffrey C, Pearle Margaret S, Cadeddu Jeffrey A
1 Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas, Texas.
2 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UT Arlington , Arlington, Texas.
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1239-1243. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0466.
We developed a polyethylene sack (the PercSac) that fits over the shaft of a rigid nephroscope and is deployed into the collecting system to capture a stone and contain fragments during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We previously reported our results using the PercSac in a percutaneous cystolithopaxy model. In this study, we compare the efficiency of stone fragmentation with and without the PercSac in an anatomically correct in vitro PCNL model.
The PCNL model consisted of a human collecting system model created on a 3D printer. Ten BegoStones made in spherical molds of 2.0 cm diameter, matched for weight, were fragmented in the model using a 24F rigid nephroscope and an ultrasonic lithotripter, including five with and five without the PercSac. The total times for stone fragmentation and complete stone clearance, gross assessment of the stone-free status, and need for flexible nephroscopy to achieve a stone-free state were recorded.
The median time for stone fragmentation was significantly shorter in the PercSac group compared with the control group (217 seconds [IQR = 169-255] vs 340 seconds [IQR = 310-356], [p = 0.028]). Likewise, the total time for complete stone clearance from the kidney was significantly shorter for the PercSac group (293 seconds [IQR = 244-347] vs 376 seconds [IQR = 375-480], [p = 0.047]). In one trial with the PercSac, residual dust remained in the kidney, while in all five trials without the PercSac small residual fragments remained. All trials without the PercSac required flexible nephroscopy with basket extraction to become stone free, while none of the trials with the PercSac required flexible nephroscopy for stone clearance.
Ultrasonic lithotripsy using the novel PercSac stone entrapment device is more efficient and efficacious than traditional ultrasonic lithotripsy in an in vitro PCNL model. The advantage may be even more pronounced during clinical PCNL where residual fragments migrate into difficult-to-access calices. Further in vivo testing is underway.
我们研发了一种聚乙烯袋(PercSac),它可套在硬性肾镜镜杆上,并在经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)期间部署到集合系统中,以捕获结石并容纳碎片。我们之前报告了在经皮膀胱结石碎石术模型中使用PercSac的结果。在本研究中,我们在解剖结构正确的体外PCNL模型中比较了使用和不使用PercSac时结石破碎的效率。
PCNL模型由在3D打印机上创建的人体集合系统模型组成。使用24F硬性肾镜和超声碎石机在模型中破碎10颗直径2.0 cm球形模具制作的、重量匹配的Bego结石,其中5颗使用PercSac,5颗不使用PercSac。记录结石破碎和完全清除结石的总时间、结石清除状态的总体评估以及为达到无结石状态所需的软性肾镜检查情况。
与对照组相比,PercSac组结石破碎的中位时间显著缩短(217秒[IQR = 169 - 255] vs 340秒[IQR = 310 - 356],[p = 0.028])。同样,PercSac组从肾脏完全清除结石的总时间也显著缩短(293秒[IQR = 244 - 347] vs 376秒[IQR = 375 - 480],[p = 0.047])。在一次使用PercSac的试验中,肾脏中残留了粉尘,而在所有5次不使用PercSac的试验中都残留了小碎片。所有不使用PercSac的试验都需要使用软性肾镜和网篮取出术才能达到无结石状态,而所有使用PercSac的试验都不需要软性肾镜检查来清除结石。
在体外PCNL模型中,使用新型PercSac结石捕获装置的超声碎石术比传统超声碎石术更高效、更有效。在临床PCNL中,当残留碎片迁移到难以到达的肾盏时,这种优势可能会更加明显。进一步的体内测试正在进行中。