Simning Adam, Simons Kelsey V
Department of Psychiatry,University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry,Rochester,New York,USA.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Feb;29(2):209-226. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216001733. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
Depression in nursing facilities is widespread and has been historically under-recognized and inadequately treated. Many interventions have targeted depression among residents with dementia in these settings. Less is known about depression treatment in residents without dementia who may be more likely to return to community living. Our study aimed to systematically evaluate randomized control trials (RCTs) in nursing facilities that targeted depression within samples largely comprised of residents without dementia.
The following databases were evaluated with searches covering January 1991 to December 2015 (PubMed, PsycINFO) and March 2016 (CINAHL). We also examined national and international clinical trial registries including ClinicalTrials.gov. RCTs were included if they were published in English, evaluated depression or depressive symptoms as primary or secondary outcomes, and included a sample with a mean age of 65 years and over for which most had no or only mild cognitive impairment.
A total of 32 RCTs met our criteria including those testing psychotherapeutic interventions (n=13), psychosocial and recreation interventions (n=9), and pharmacologic or other biologic interventions (n=10). Seven psychotherapeutic, six psychosocial and recreation, and four pharmacologic or other biologic interventions demonstrated a treatment benefit.
Many studies had small samples, were of poor methodological quality, and did not select for depressed residents. There is limited evidence suggesting that cognitive behavioral therapies, reminiscence, interventions to reduce social isolation, and exercise-based interventions have some promise for decreasing depression in cognitively intact nursing home residents; little can be concluded from the pharmacologic or other biologic RCTs.
护理机构中的抑郁症很普遍,历来未得到充分认识和治疗。在这些环境中,许多干预措施都针对患有痴呆症的居民中的抑郁症。对于那些更有可能回归社区生活的无痴呆症居民的抑郁症治疗,了解较少。我们的研究旨在系统评价护理机构中针对主要由无痴呆症居民组成的样本中的抑郁症的随机对照试验(RCT)。
对以下数据库进行了评估,检索时间涵盖1991年1月至2015年12月(PubMed、PsycINFO)以及2016年3月(CINAHL)。我们还查阅了包括ClinicalTrials.gov在内的国家和国际临床试验注册库。如果RCT以英文发表、将抑郁症或抑郁症状作为主要或次要结局进行评估,并且纳入的样本平均年龄在65岁及以上且大多数无认知障碍或仅有轻度认知障碍,则纳入研究。
共有32项RCT符合我们的标准,包括测试心理治疗干预措施的研究(n = 13)、心理社会和娱乐干预措施的研究(n = 9)以及药物或其他生物干预措施的研究(n = 10)。七种心理治疗、六种心理社会和娱乐以及四种药物或其他生物干预措施显示出治疗效果。
许多研究样本量小、方法学质量差,且未选择抑郁的居民。仅有有限的证据表明认知行为疗法、回忆疗法、减少社会隔离的干预措施以及基于运动锻炼的干预措施在降低认知功能完好的养老院居民的抑郁症方面有一定前景;从药物或其他生物RCT中几乎无法得出结论。