Toscano Hugo, Schubert Thomas W, Dotsch Ron, Falvello Virginia, Todorov Alexander
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social, Portugal
University of Oslo, Norway.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Dec;42(12):1603-1616. doi: 10.1177/0146167216666266. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
We investigate both similarities and differences between dominance and strength judgments using a data-driven approach. First, we created statistical face shape models of judgments of both dominance and physical strength. The resulting faces representing dominance and strength were highly similar, and participants were at chance in discriminating faces generated by the two models. Second, although the models are highly correlated, it is possible to create a model that captures their differences. This model generates faces that vary from dominant-yet-physically weak to nondominant-yet-physically strong. Participants were able to identify the difference in strength between the physically strong-yet-nondominant faces and the physically weak-yet-dominant faces. However, this was not the case for identifying dominance. These results suggest that representations of social dominance and physical strength are highly similar, and that strength is used as a cue for dominance more than dominance is used as a cue for strength.
我们采用数据驱动的方法研究了支配力判断和力量判断之间的异同。首先,我们创建了支配力判断和身体力量判断的统计面部形状模型。所得到的代表支配力和力量的面部高度相似,参与者难以区分由这两个模型生成的面部。其次,尽管这些模型高度相关,但仍有可能创建一个捕捉它们差异的模型。这个模型生成的面部从占主导地位但身体虚弱到不占主导地位但身体强壮各不相同。参与者能够识别身体强壮但不占主导地位的面部与身体虚弱但占主导地位的面部之间的力量差异。然而,在识别支配力方面并非如此。这些结果表明,社会支配力和身体力量的表征高度相似,并且力量比支配力更常被用作支配力的线索。