Paglia L
Head Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Istituto Stomatologico Italiano, Milan (Italy).
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2016 Sep;17(3):173.
Despite the general advances in dental care, dental caries is still a global health problem affecting many children. Occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars are the most susceptible sites in the developing permanent dentition. Dentists should use sealants or fluoride varnish - as well as other means - to limit the onset of tooth decay. Application of sealants is a recommended procedure to prevent or control caries. Sealing occlusal surfaces of newly erupted permanent molars in children and teenagers delays caries onset up to 48 months compared with unsealed teeth. However longer follow-ups shows a reduction of the preventive effect [Tikhonova et al., 2015]. A review of 2013 pointed out how sealants are effective in high risk children, however information about the benefits of sealing in other conditions is still scant [Ahovuo-Saloranta et al., 2013]. Fluoride varnishes are frequently used to prevent early childhood caries and reduce caries increment in very young children [Weintraub et al., 2006] and in the most vulnerable populations, where the prevalence of caries is higher and specialist visits are occasional [Chu et al., 2010]. Many studies have reported the effectiveness of different types and forms of fluoride agents in preventing dental caries among children and adolescents [Divaris et al., 2013]. A review clarifies that professional application of a 5% sodium fluoride varnish leads to remineralisation of early enamel caries in children. Solutions of 38% silver diamine fluoride are effective in arresting active dentine caries [Gao et al., 2016]. The last systematic review [Ahovuo-Saloranta et al., 2016], comparing pit and fissure sealants with fluoride varnishes explains that the pooled estimate slightly favours resin sealants over fluoride varnishes at two years. At four and nine years, the only comparative study (with high drop-out rates) found more caries on fluoride-varnished occlusal surfaces than on resin-sealed surfaces. There is evidence suggesting the superiority of resin-based fissure sealants over fluoride varnishes for prevention of occlusal caries in permanent molars, however it is not relevant. Eventually, Ahovuo-Saloranta et al. state that current data do not allow to draw definitive conclusions on whether to apply sealants or fluoride varnishes on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars [2016]. We will publish your opinion and experiences related to this topic in the next EJPD issue: join the discussion and write a letter to the editor!
尽管牙科护理取得了普遍进展,但龋齿仍是一个影响众多儿童的全球健康问题。第一恒磨牙的咬合面是正在发育的恒牙列中最易患龋的部位。牙医应使用窝沟封闭剂或氟化物 varnish(此处原文可能有误,推测是氟化物清漆)——以及其他方法——来限制龋齿的发生。应用窝沟封闭剂是预防或控制龋齿的推荐方法。与未封闭的牙齿相比,为儿童和青少年新萌出的恒磨牙封闭咬合面可将龋齿发生延迟长达48个月。然而,更长时间的随访显示预防效果有所降低[季霍诺娃等人,2015年]。2013年的一项综述指出窝沟封闭剂对高危儿童有效,然而关于在其他情况下封闭的益处的信息仍然很少[阿霍武奥 - 萨洛兰塔等人,2013年]。氟化物清漆经常用于预防幼儿龋齿并减少幼儿[温特劳布等人,2006年]以及在龋齿患病率较高且偶尔看专科医生的最脆弱人群中的龋齿增量[朱等人,2010年]。许多研究报告了不同类型和形式的氟化物制剂在预防儿童和青少年龋齿方面的有效性[迪瓦里斯等人,2013年]。一项综述阐明专业应用5%的氟化钠清漆可使儿童早期釉质龋再矿化。38%的氟化银氨溶液对阻止活动性牙本质龋有效[高等人,2016年]。最近的系统综述[阿霍武奥 - 萨洛兰塔等人,2016年]比较了窝沟封闭剂和氟化物清漆,解释说在两年时汇总估计值略微倾向于树脂封闭剂而非氟化物清漆。在四年和九年时,唯一的比较研究(脱落率高)发现氟化物清漆处理的咬合面龋齿比树脂封闭的表面更多。有证据表明基于树脂的窝沟封闭剂在预防恒磨牙咬合面龋齿方面优于氟化物清漆,然而这并不相关。最终,阿霍武奥 - 萨洛兰塔等人指出目前的数据不允许就是否在恒磨牙咬合面应用封闭剂或氟化物清漆得出明确结论[2016年]。我们将在下一期《欧洲儿科牙科学杂志》上发表你关于这个主题的观点和经验:加入讨论并给编辑写信!