Vliegenthart Roseanne J S, Ten Hove Christine H, Onland Wes, van Kaam Anton H L C
Department of Neonatology, Emma Childrens' Hospital AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neonatology. 2017;111(2):162-171. doi: 10.1159/000448941. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is a common complication of preterm birth, for which caffeine is the first treatment of choice. In case of persistent AOP, doxapram has been advocated as an additional therapy.
To identify and appraise all existing evidence regarding efficacy and safety of doxapram use for AOP in infants born before 34 weeks of gestational age.
All studies reporting on doxapram use for AOP were identified by searching electronic databases, references from relevant studies, and abstracts from the Societies for Pediatric Research. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and quality, and extracted data on study design, patient characteristics, efficacy and safety outcomes.
The randomized controlled trials showed less apnea during doxapram treatment when compared to placebo, but no difference in treatment effect when compared to theophylline. No serious adverse effects were reported. We identified 28 observational studies consisting mainly of cohort studies and case series (n = 1,994). There was considerable heterogeneity in study design and quality. Most studies reported a positive effect of doxapram on apnea rate. A few studies reported on long-term outcomes with conflicting results. A range of possible doxapram-related short-term adverse effects were reported, sometimes associated with the use of higher doses.
Based on the limited number of studies and level of evidence, no firm conclusions on the efficacy and safety of doxapram in preterm infants can be drawn. For this reason, routine use cannot be recommended. A large multicenter randomized controlled trial is urgently needed to provide more conclusive evidence.
早产呼吸暂停(AOP)是早产常见的并发症,咖啡因是其首选治疗药物。对于持续性AOP,多沙普仑被推荐作为辅助治疗。
识别并评估所有关于多沙普仑用于胎龄小于34周婴儿AOP的疗效和安全性的现有证据。
通过检索电子数据库、相关研究的参考文献以及儿科研究学会的摘要,识别所有报道多沙普仑用于AOP的研究。两名评价者独立评估研究的纳入标准和质量,并提取关于研究设计、患者特征、疗效和安全性结局的数据。
随机对照试验显示,与安慰剂相比,多沙普仑治疗期间呼吸暂停较少,但与茶碱相比,治疗效果无差异。未报告严重不良反应。我们识别出28项观察性研究,主要包括队列研究和病例系列(n = 1,994)。研究设计和质量存在相当大的异质性。大多数研究报告多沙普仑对呼吸暂停发生率有积极影响。少数研究报告了长期结局,但结果相互矛盾。报告了一系列可能与多沙普仑相关的短期不良反应,有时与高剂量使用有关。
基于研究数量有限和证据水平,无法就多沙普仑在早产儿中的疗效和安全性得出确凿结论。因此,不推荐常规使用。迫切需要开展一项大型多中心随机对照试验以提供更确凿的证据。