Drewry Anne M, Ablordeppey Enyo A, Murray Ellen T, Beiter Evan R, Walton Andrew H, Hall Mark W, Hotchkiss Richard S
Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Departments of Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Crit Care. 2016 Oct 20;20(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1505-0.
Identifying patients in the immunosuppressive phase of sepsis is essential for development of immunomodulatory therapies. Little data exists comparing the ability of the two most well-studied markers of sepsis-induced immunosuppression, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR expression and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-ɑ) production, to predict mortality and morbidity. The purpose of this study was to compare HLA-DR expression and LPS-induced TNF-ɑ production as predictors of 28-day mortality and acquisition of secondary infections in adult septic patients.
A single-center, prospective observational study of 83 adult septic patients admitted to a medical or surgical intensive care unit. Blood samples were collected at three time points during the septic course (days 1-2, days 3-4, and days 6-8 after sepsis diagnosis) and assayed for HLA-DR expression and LPS-induced TNF-ɑ production. A repeated measures mixed model analysis was used to compare values of these immunological markers among survivors and non-survivors and among those who did and did not develop a secondary infection.
Twenty-five patients (30.1 %) died within 28 days of sepsis diagnosis. HLA-DR expression was significantly lower in non-survivors as compared to survivors on days 3-4 (p = 0.04) and days 6-8 (p = 0.002). The change in HLA-DR from days 1-2 to days 6-8 was also lower in non-survivors (p = 0.04). Median HLA-DR expression decreased from days 1-2 to days 3-4 in patients who developed secondary infections while it increased in those without secondary infections (p = 0.054). TNF-ɑ production did not differ between survivors and non-survivors or between patients who did and did not develop a secondary infection.
Monocyte HLA-DR expression may be a more accurate predictor of mortality and acquisition of secondary infections than LPS-stimulated TNF-ɑ production in adult medical and surgical critically ill patients.
识别处于脓毒症免疫抑制期的患者对于免疫调节治疗的发展至关重要。关于脓毒症诱导免疫抑制的两个研究最为充分的标志物,即人类白细胞抗原(HLA)-DR表达和脂多糖(LPS)诱导的肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)产生,在预测死亡率和发病率方面的能力,目前的数据较少。本研究的目的是比较HLA-DR表达和LPS诱导的TNF-α产生作为成人脓毒症患者28天死亡率和继发感染获得情况的预测指标。
对83名入住内科或外科重症监护病房的成人脓毒症患者进行单中心前瞻性观察研究。在脓毒症病程中的三个时间点(脓毒症诊断后第1 - 2天、第3 - 4天和第6 - 8天)采集血样,检测HLA-DR表达和LPS诱导的TNF-α产生。采用重复测量混合模型分析比较这些免疫标志物在幸存者和非幸存者之间以及发生和未发生继发感染的患者之间的值。
25名患者(30.1%)在脓毒症诊断后28天内死亡。在第3 - 4天(p = 0.04)和第6 - 8天(p = 0.002),非幸存者的HLA-DR表达明显低于幸存者。非幸存者从第1 - 2天到第6 - 8天HLA-DR的变化也较低(p = 0.04)。发生继发感染的患者中,HLA-DR表达从第1 - 2天到第3 - 4天下降,而未发生继发感染的患者中则升高(p = 0.054)。幸存者和非幸存者之间或发生和未发生继发感染的患者之间,TNF-α产生没有差异。
在成人内科和外科重症患者中,单核细胞HLA-DR表达可能比LPS刺激的TNF-α产生更准确地预测死亡率和继发感染的获得情况。