Young Matthew E, Bell Ziv E, Fristad Mary A
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2016 Dec;23(4):327-340. doi: 10.1007/s10880-016-9474-7.
Evidence-based assessment is important in the treatment of childhood psychopathology. While researchers and clinicians frequently use structured diagnostic interviews to ensure reliability, the most commonly used instrument, the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children (K-SADS) is too long for most clinical applications. The Children's Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes (ChIPS/P-ChIPS) is a highly-structured brief diagnostic interview. The present study compared K-SADS and ChIPS/P-ChIPS diagnoses in an outpatient clinical sample of 50 parent-child pairs aged 7-14. Agreement between most diagnoses was moderate to high between the instruments and with consensus clinical diagnoses. ChIPS was significantly briefer to administer than the K-SADS. Interviewer experience level and participant demographics did not appear to affect agreement. Results provide further evidence for the validity of the ChIPS and support its use in clinical and research settings.
循证评估在儿童精神病理学治疗中很重要。虽然研究人员和临床医生经常使用结构化诊断访谈来确保可靠性,但最常用的工具——《儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表》(K-SADS)对于大多数临床应用来说太长了。《儿童精神综合征访谈量表》(ChIPS/P-ChIPS)是一种高度结构化的简短诊断访谈。本研究在一个由50对7至14岁亲子组成的门诊临床样本中比较了K-SADS和ChIPS/P-ChIPS的诊断结果。两种工具之间以及与一致的临床诊断之间,大多数诊断结果的一致性为中等至高度。ChIPS的施测时间明显比K-SADS短。访谈者的经验水平和参与者的人口统计学特征似乎并未影响一致性。研究结果为ChIPS的有效性提供了进一步证据,并支持其在临床和研究环境中的使用。