Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USA.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(1):139-59. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2012.736358. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
Assessment has been a historical strength of psychology, with sophisticated traditions of measurement, psychometrics, and theoretical underpinnings. However, training, reimbursement, and utilization of psychological assessment have been eroded in many settings. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) offers a different perspective on evaluation that complements traditional strengths of psychological assessment. EBM ties assessment directly to clinical decision making about the individual, uses simplified Bayesian methods explicitly to integrate assessment data, and solicits patient preferences as part of the decision-making process. Combining the EBM perspective with psychological assessment creates a hybrid approach that is more client centered, and it defines a set of applied research topics that are highly clinically relevant. This article offers a sequence of a dozen facets of the revised assessment process, along with examples of corollary research studies. An eclectic integration of EBM and evidence-based assessment generates a powerful hybrid that is likely to have broad applicability within clinical psychology and enhance the utility of psychological assessments.
评估一直是心理学的一个历史优势,具有成熟的测量、心理测量学和理论基础传统。然而,在许多情况下,心理评估的培训、报销和使用都受到了侵蚀。循证医学(EBM)为评估提供了一个不同的视角,补充了心理评估的传统优势。EBM 将评估直接与关于个体的临床决策联系起来,使用简化的贝叶斯方法明确地整合评估数据,并将患者的偏好作为决策过程的一部分。将 EBM 视角与心理评估相结合,创建了一种更以客户为中心的混合方法,并定义了一系列高度临床相关的应用研究课题。本文提供了修订后的评估过程的十二个方面的顺序,以及相关研究的示例。EBM 和基于证据的评估的折衷整合产生了一种强大的混合方法,很可能在临床心理学中有广泛的适用性,并增强心理评估的实用性。