• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对常见误解的纠正性反馈的信念:对知识修订的影响。

Belief in corrective feedback for common misconceptions: Implications for knowledge revision.

作者信息

Rich Patrick R, Van Loon Mariëtte H, Dunlosky John, Zaragoza Maria S

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University.

Department of Psychology, University of Bern.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Mar;43(3):492-501. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000322. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000322
PMID:27762579
Abstract

When correcting a common misconception, it seems likely that for corrective feedback to be effective, it needs to be believed. In 2 experiments, we assessed how participants' belief in the validity of corrective feedback regarding individual misconceptions influenced knowledge revision. After responding about the validity of a set of misconceptions, participants received either a refutation alone (feedback that they were correct or incorrect) or a refutation accompanied by a supporting explanation, and then rated their belief in the corrective feedback. One week later, participants once again responded about the validity of the misconceptions. Across both experiments, participants corrected their misconceptions more often when they believed the corrective feedback. In addition, participants corrected their misconceptions more often when they had earlier received a refutation with a supporting explanation than when they had received the refutation only. This benefit of supportive explanations on knowledge revision was mediated by belief in the feedback, suggesting that explanations enhance the effectiveness of a correction by increasing belief in the feedback. These findings imply that successful correction of common misconceptions is likely enhanced by techniques that increase people's belief in the validity of the corrective feedback. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

在纠正一个常见的误解时,似乎为了使纠正性反馈有效,它需要被相信。在两项实验中,我们评估了参与者对关于个体误解的纠正性反馈有效性的信念如何影响知识修正。在对一组误解的有效性做出回应后,参与者要么只收到一个反驳(表明他们正确或错误的反馈),要么收到一个伴有支持性解释的反驳,然后对他们对纠正性反馈的信念进行评分。一周后,参与者再次对误解的有效性做出回应。在两项实验中,当参与者相信纠正性反馈时,他们更频繁地纠正自己的误解。此外,与只收到反驳相比,当参与者早些时候收到伴有支持性解释的反驳时,他们更频繁地纠正自己的误解。支持性解释对知识修正的这种益处是由对反馈的信念介导的,这表明解释通过增加对反馈的信念来提高纠正的有效性。这些发现意味着,通过增加人们对纠正性反馈有效性信念的技术,可能会增强对常见误解的成功纠正。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
Belief in corrective feedback for common misconceptions: Implications for knowledge revision.对常见误解的纠正性反馈的信念:对知识修订的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Mar;43(3):492-501. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000322. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
2
Older and younger adults' revision of health misconceptions.老年人和年轻人对健康误解的修正。
Memory. 2022 Feb;30(2):172-189. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1999981. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Refuting misconceptions in medical physiology.驳斥医学生理学中的误解。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02166-6.
4
Confirmation bias and misconceptions: Pupillometric evidence for a confirmation bias in misconceptions feedback.确认偏误和误解:瞳孔测量证据表明,在误解反馈中存在确认偏误。
Biol Psychol. 2019 Jul;145:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
5
The effects of positive and negative emotional text content on knowledge revision.积极和消极情绪文本内容对知识复习的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Sep;73(9):1326-1339. doi: 10.1177/1747021820913816. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
6
The effects of experimentally induced emotions on revising common vaccine misconceptions.实验诱发情绪对修正常见疫苗误解的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1966-1980. doi: 10.1177/17470218211017840. Epub 2021 May 15.
7
An Attempt to Correct Erroneous Ideas Among Teacher Education Students: The Effectiveness of Refutation Texts.纠正教师教育专业学生错误观念的尝试:反驳性文本的有效性。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 9;11:577738. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577738. eCollection 2020.
8
The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information.熟悉度在纠正不准确信息方面的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Dec;43(12):1948-1961. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000422. Epub 2017 May 15.
9
Beyond hypercorrection: remembering corrective feedback for low-confidence errors.超越过度纠正:记住对低置信度错误的纠正反馈。
Memory. 2018 Feb;26(2):201-218. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1344249. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
10
Dynamic source credibility and its impacts on knowledge revision.动态来源可信度及其对知识修正的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Oct;52(7):1548-1566. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01562-3. Epub 2024 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Correcting Neuromyths on Students' and Teachers' Later Reasoning.纠正神经科学误解对学生和教师后续推理的影响
J Intell. 2024 Oct 1;12(10):98. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12100098.
2
Optimizing self-organized study orders: combining refutations and metacognitive prompts improves the use of interleaved practice.优化自主学习顺序:结合反驳与元认知提示可提高交错练习的运用效果。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2024 Apr 24;9(1):33. doi: 10.1038/s41539-024-00245-7.
3
Test Experience, Direct Instruction, and Their Combination Promote Accurate Beliefs about the Testing Effect.
测试体验、直接指导及其组合促进对测试效应的准确认知。
J Intell. 2023 Jul 21;11(7):147. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11070147.
4
Memory failure predicts belief regression after the correction of misinformation.记忆失败预测了错误信息纠正后的信念回归。
Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105276. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105276. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
5
Contextualized Knowledge Reduces Misconceived COVID-19 Health Decisions.情境化知识可减少对新冠疫情健康决策的误解。
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2021 Sep;10(3):381-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.07.007. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
6
The global effectiveness of fact-checking: Evidence from simultaneous experiments in Argentina, Nigeria, South Africa, and the United Kingdom.事实核查的全球有效性:来自阿根廷、尼日利亚、南非和英国同时进行的实验的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 14;118(37). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104235118.
7
Memory and truth: correcting errors with true feedback versus overwriting correct answers with errors.记忆与真相:通过真实反馈纠正错误与用错误覆盖正确答案。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Feb 13;4(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0153-8.