Garner Hillary W, Paturzo Michelle M, Gaudier Gabriela, Pickhardt Perry J, Wessell Daniel E
1 Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224.
2 College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan;208(1):165-170. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16744. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the variation in attenuation values (expressed as Hounsfield units) for L1 vertebral body trabecular bone at different tube voltages used in dual-energy CT (DECT) and to remind physicians to consider changes in attenuation values when they approach opportunistic screening for osteoporosis.
Consecutive patients who underwent DECT examination of the abdomen and pelvis for suspected urolithiasis were included in the study. Attenuation noted on CT of the L1 trabecular bone performed with the use of tube voltages of 80, 100, and 140 kV was recorded. The correlation between the attenuation noted when the tube voltage was 140 kV and the attenuation noted when the tube voltage was either 80 or 100 kV was calculated, and differences in the mean CT attenuation values were compared.
The mean attenuation values from L1 trabecular bone measurement performed for 191 patients were analyzed. As expected, the mean attenuation values decreased as the tube voltage increased. There was a strong correlation between the attenuation values noted when tube voltages of 80 and 140 kV were used (r = 0.97) and those noted when 100 and 140 kV were used (r = 0.96). The mean attenuation value noted at 80 kV was 76.4 HU (65%) higher than that noted at 140 kV (p < 0.001). The mean attenuation value at 100 kV was 45.5 HU (39.9%) higher than that noted at 140 kV (p < 0.001).
We confirmed that attenuation values of L1 trabecular bone, unlike attenuation values of fat, fluid, or soft tissue, vary at different CT x-ray tube voltages. Therefore, standard reference attenuation values for trabecular bone seen at 120 kV cannot be applied to other single-energy settings, DECT, or CT examinations where dose modulation software automatically raises or lowers the tube voltage from 120 kV. Knowledge of the specific energy spectra used is essential before performing opportunistic CT evaluation for osteoporosis.
本研究旨在探讨双能CT(DECT)中不同管电压下L1椎体小梁骨的衰减值(以亨氏单位表示)变化情况,并提醒医生在进行骨质疏松症机会性筛查时考虑衰减值的变化。
纳入因疑似尿路结石接受腹部和盆腔DECT检查的连续患者。记录使用80、100和140 kV管电压时L1小梁骨CT上的衰减值。计算管电压为140 kV时记录的衰减值与管电压为80或100 kV时记录的衰减值之间的相关性,并比较平均CT衰减值的差异。
分析了191例患者L1小梁骨测量的平均衰减值。正如预期的那样,平均衰减值随管电压升高而降低。使用80和140 kV管电压时记录的衰减值之间存在强相关性(r = 0.97),使用100和140 kV管电压时记录的衰减值之间也存在强相关性(r = 0.96)。80 kV时记录的平均衰减值比140 kV时高76.4 HU(65%)(p < 0.001)。100 kV时的平均衰减值比140 kV时高45.5 HU(39.9%)(p < 0.001)。
我们证实,与脂肪、液体或软组织的衰减值不同,L1小梁骨的衰减值在不同的CT X射线管电压下会有所变化。因此,120 kV时看到的小梁骨标准参考衰减值不能应用于其他单能设置、DECT或剂量调制软件自动将管电压从120 kV升高或降低的CT检查。在进行骨质疏松症的机会性CT评估之前,了解所使用的特定能谱至关重要。