Jung K, Pergande M, Klotzek S
Department of Experimental Organ Transplantation, University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University Berlin, G.D.R.
Clin Chem. 1989 Sep;35(9):1955-7.
We compared sialidase (neuraminidase; EC 3.2.1.18) from Vibrio cholerae, Clostridium perfringens, and Arthrobacter ureafaciens, seeking to improve the electrophoretic separation of the liver and bone isoenzymes of alkaline phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.1) on cellulose acetate membranes. Resolution is decisively determined by the type and activity of sialidase used in the preincubation of serum sample. Sialidase from Arthrobacter ureafaciens is not suited for this method. For optimal separation of the two isoenzymes we recommend the use of sialidase from Vibrio cholerae, determination of its activity with a standard procedure such as described here (mucin or sialyl lactose as substrates), and a final concentration of sialidase activity of 2.0 or 2.9 U/L (measured with mucin or sialyl lactose) in the incubation mixture.
我们比较了霍乱弧菌、产气荚膜梭菌和脲节杆菌的唾液酸酶(神经氨酸酶;EC 3.2.1.18),旨在改进碱性磷酸酶(EC 3.1.3.1)的肝脏和骨同工酶在醋酸纤维素膜上的电泳分离效果。分辨率决定性地取决于血清样品预孵育中所用唾液酸酶的类型和活性。脲节杆菌的唾液酸酶不适合此方法。为了实现两种同工酶的最佳分离,我们建议使用霍乱弧菌的唾液酸酶,采用此处所述的标准程序(以粘蛋白或唾液酸乳糖为底物)测定其活性,并在孵育混合物中使唾液酸酶活性的终浓度达到2.0或2.9 U/L(以粘蛋白或唾液酸乳糖测定)。