Latner B P, Skale J S, Burns W
Department of Pathology, Pacific Presbyterian Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94120.
Clin Chem. 1989 Sep;35(9):1965-8.
In an effort to clarify the issue of potentially false increases in creatine kinase (EC 2.7.3.2) MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) in uremia, we evaluated the CK profile of 84 persons undergoing chronic maintenance hemodialysis. We compared the performance of a new commercial two-site chemiluminometric immunoassay of CK-MB (Magic Lite; Ciba Corning Diagnostics) with that of electrophoresis on agarose gel (Cardio Trak-CK; Corning Medical). Results of the new chemiluminometric immunoassay for samples from hemodialysis patients correlated well with those of the electrophoretic method (r = 0.86, P less than 0.001), showing that neither substances in the serum of uremic patients nor CK-MM isoenzyme give false-positive increases in CK-MB isoenzyme. Our evidence suggests that the chemiluminometric method may be more specific than is electrophoresis in establishing absolute CK-MB values in the diagnosis of suspected myocardial injury in this population.
为了阐明尿毒症患者中肌酸激酶(EC 2.7.3.2)MB同工酶(CK-MB)可能出现的假性升高问题,我们评估了84例接受慢性维持性血液透析患者的CK谱。我们将一种新的商业化双位点化学发光免疫分析法检测CK-MB(Magic Lite;汽巴康宁诊断公司)与琼脂糖凝胶电泳法(Cardio Trak-CK;康宁医疗公司)的性能进行了比较。血液透析患者样本的新型化学发光免疫分析结果与电泳法结果相关性良好(r = 0.86,P < 0.001),表明尿毒症患者血清中的物质和CK-MM同工酶均未导致CK-MB同工酶出现假阳性升高。我们的证据表明,在确定该人群疑似心肌损伤诊断中的绝对CK-MB值时,化学发光法可能比电泳法更具特异性。