Koch T R, Mehta U J, Nipper H C
Clin Chem. 1986 Jan;32(1 Pt 1):186-91.
We studied the analytical and clinical performance of six methods for creatine kinase (EC 2.7.3.2) isoenzyme MB (CK-MB): three immunoassays (Behring, Hybritech, and International Immunoassay Labs); one immunoinhibition assay (Roche); one immunoinhibition/column method (Du Pont); and one electrophoretic method (Beckman). Between-day precision for all kits was poor at the upper reference limit. All methods gave results linearly related to CK-MB concentration and all were free from CK-MM, CK-BB, and adenylate kinase interference. Only the Du Pont method was adversely affected by atypical isoenzymes. For diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in a coronary care population (n = 40; prevalence = 45%), all methods were approximately 95% efficient, when appropriate reference criteria were used. Some manufacturers fail to provide data for an appropriate (acutely ill, non-infarct) reference population; decreased diagnostic specificity may result from use of reference ranges based on results for healthy subjects. Expression of CK-MB as a percent of total CK degrades efficiency unless total CK is markedly increased.
我们研究了六种肌酸激酶(EC 2.7.3.2)同工酶MB(CK-MB)检测方法的分析性能和临床性能:三种免疫测定法(贝林、海布里奇和国际免疫测定实验室);一种免疫抑制测定法(罗氏);一种免疫抑制/柱法(杜邦);以及一种电泳法(贝克曼)。所有试剂盒在上参考限的日间精密度均较差。所有方法的结果均与CK-MB浓度呈线性相关,且均不受CK-MM、CK-BB和腺苷酸激酶的干扰。只有杜邦方法受到非典型同工酶的不利影响。在冠心病监护病房人群(n = 40;患病率 = 45%)中诊断急性心肌梗死时,若使用适当的参考标准,所有方法的效率约为95%。一些制造商未提供适用于(急性病、非梗死)参考人群的数据;使用基于健康受试者结果的参考范围可能会导致诊断特异性降低。除非总CK显著升高,否则将CK-MB表示为总CK的百分比会降低效率。