Forton Kevin, Motoji Yoshiki, Deboeck Gael, Faoro Vitalie, Naeije Robert
Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Motor Science, Free University of Brussels Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; and.
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Nov 1;121(5):1145-1150. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00372.2016. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
There has been revival of interest in exercise testing of the pulmonary circulation for the diagnosis of pulmonary vascular disease, but there still is uncertainty about body position and the most relevant measurements. Doppler echocardiography pulmonary hemodynamic measurements were performed at progressively increased workloads in 26 healthy adult volunteers in supine, semirecumbent, and upright positions that were randomly assigned at 24-h intervals. Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) was estimated from the maximum tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity. Cardiac output was calculated from the left ventricular outflow velocity-time integral. Pulmonary vascular distensibility α-index, the percent change of vessel diameter per millimeter mercury of mPAP, was calculated from multipoint mPAP-cardiac output plots. Body position did not affect maximum oxygen uptake (Vo), maximum respiratory exchange ratio, ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide, or slope of mPAP-cardiac output relationships, which was on average of 1.5 ± 0.4 mmHg·l·min Maximum mPAP, cardiac output, and total pulmonary vascular resistance were, respectively, 34 ± 4 mmHg, 18 ± 3 l/min, and 1.9 ± 0.3 Wood units. However, the semirecumbent position was associated with a 10% decrease in maximum workload. Furthermore, cardiac output-workload or cardiac output-Vo relationships were nonlinear and variable. These results suggest that body position does not affect maximum exercise testing of the pulmonary circulation when results are expressed as mPAP-cardiac output or maximum total pulmonary vascular resistance. Maximum workload is decreased in semirecumbent compared with upright exercise. Workload or Vo cannot reliably be used as surrogates for cardiac output.
对于肺血管疾病的诊断,人们对肺循环运动试验的兴趣再度兴起,但在体位及最相关的测量方面仍存在不确定性。对26名健康成年志愿者进行了多普勒超声心动图肺血流动力学测量,这些志愿者以仰卧位、半卧位和直立位进行逐步增加负荷的运动,体位在24小时间隔内随机分配。平均肺动脉压(mPAP)通过三尖瓣反流最大流速估算。心输出量根据左心室流出道流速-时间积分计算。肺血管扩张性α指数,即mPAP每毫米汞柱变化时血管直径的百分比变化,根据多点mPAP-心输出量图计算得出。体位不影响最大摄氧量(Vo)、最大呼吸交换率、二氧化碳通气当量或mPAP-心输出量关系的斜率,其平均斜率为1.5±0.4 mmHg·l·min。最大mPAP、心输出量和总肺血管阻力分别为34±4 mmHg、18±3 l/min和1.9±0.3伍德单位。然而,半卧位与最大负荷降低10%相关。此外,心输出量-负荷或心输出量-Vo关系是非线性且多变的。这些结果表明,当结果以mPAP-心输出量或最大总肺血管阻力表示时,体位不影响肺循环的最大运动试验。与直立运动相比,半卧位运动时最大负荷降低。负荷或Vo不能可靠地用作心输出量的替代指标。