Sports Cardiology Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 May;121(5):1487-1498. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04630-7. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
Semi-supine and supine cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with concurrent cardiac imaging has emerged as a valuable tool for evaluating patients with cardiovascular disease. Yet, it is unclear how posture effects CPET measures. We aimed to discern the effect of posture on maximal oxygen uptake (VOmax) and its determinants using three clinically relevant cycle ergometers.
In random order, 10 healthy, active males (Age 27 ± 7 years; BMI 23 ± 2 kg m) underwent a ramp CPET and subsequent constant workload verification test performed at 105% peak ramp power to quantify VOmax on upright, semi-supine and supine cycle ergometers. Doppler echocardiography was conducted at peak exercise to measure stroke volume (SV) which was multiplied by heart rate (HR) to calculate cardiac output (CO).
Compared to upright (46.8 ± 11.2 ml/kg/min), VOmax was progressively reduced in semi-supine (43.8 ± 10.6 ml/kg/min) and supine (38.2 ± 9.3 ml/kg/min; upright vs. semi-supine vs. supine; all p ≤ 0.005). Similarly, peak power was highest in upright (325 ± 80 W), followed by semi-supine (298 ± 72 W) and supine (200 ± 51 W; upright vs. semi-supine vs. supine; all p < 0.01). Peak HR decreased progressively from upright to semi-supine to supine (186 ± 11 vs. 176 ± 13 vs. 169 ± 12 bpm; all p < 0.05). Peak SV and CO were lower in supine relative to semi-supine and upright (82 ± 22 vs. 92 ± 26 vs. 91 ± 24 ml and 14 ± 3 vs. 16 ± 4 vs. 17 ± 4 l/min; all p < 0.01), but not different between semi-supine and upright.
VOmax is progressively reduced in reclined postures. Thus, posture should be considered when comparing VOmax results between different testing modalities.
半卧位和卧位心肺运动测试(CPET)与心脏影像学同时进行,已成为评估心血管疾病患者的有价值工具。然而,目前尚不清楚体位如何影响 CPET 测量。我们旨在使用三种临床相关的自行车测功计来辨别体位对最大摄氧量(VOmax)及其决定因素的影响。
10 名健康、活跃的男性(年龄 27±7 岁;BMI 23±2kg/m2)按随机顺序进行斜坡 CPET,随后进行恒定负荷验证测试,以 105%的峰值斜坡功率在直立、半卧位和卧位自行车测功器上量化 VOmax。在运动峰值时进行多普勒超声心动图检查,以测量每搏输出量(SV),然后将 SV 乘以心率(HR)以计算心输出量(CO)。
与直立(46.8±11.2ml/kg/min)相比,半卧位(43.8±10.6ml/kg/min)和卧位(38.2±9.3ml/kg/min;直立 vs. 半卧位 vs. 卧位;所有 p 值均≤0.005)的 VOmax 逐渐降低。同样,峰值功率在直立时最高(325±80W),其次是半卧位(298±72W)和卧位(200±51W;直立 vs. 半卧位 vs. 卧位;所有 p 值均<0.01)。峰值 HR 从直立到半卧位再到卧位逐渐降低(186±11 比 176±13 比 169±12bpm;所有 p 值均<0.05)。卧位时 SV 和 CO 均低于半卧位和直立位(82±22 比 92±26 比 91±24ml 和 14±3 比 16±4 比 17±4l/min;所有 p 值均<0.01),但半卧位和直立位之间无差异。
卧位时 VOmax 逐渐降低。因此,在比较不同测试模式之间的 VOmax 结果时,应考虑体位。