Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Jul;17(4):708-720. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12618. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
Taxon-specific DNA tests are applied to many ecological and management questions, increasingly using environmental DNA (eDNA). eDNA facilitates noninvasive ecological studies but introduces additional risks of bias and error. For effective application, PCR primers must be developed for each taxon and validated in each system. We outline a nine step framework for the development and validation of taxon-specific primers for eDNA analysis in ecological studies, involving reference database construction, phylogenetic evaluation of the target gene, primer design, primer evaluation in silico, and laboratory evaluation of primer specificity, sensitivity and utility. Our framework makes possible a rigorous evaluation of likely sources of error. The first five steps can be conducted relatively rapidly and (where reference DNA sequences are available) require minimal laboratory resources, enabling assessment of primer suitability before investing in further work. Steps six to eight require more costly laboratory analyses but are essential to evaluate risks of false-positive and false-negative results, while step 9 relates to field implementation. As an example, we have developed and evaluated primers to specifically amplify part of the mitochondrial ND2 gene from Australian bandicoots. If adopted during the early stages of primer development, our framework will facilitate large-scale implementation of well-designed DNA tests to detect specific wildlife from eDNA samples. This will provide researchers and managers with an understanding of the strengths and limitations of their data and the conclusions that can be drawn from them.
基于 DNA 的分类学特异性测试被广泛应用于生态学和管理研究中,尤其是在环境 DNA(eDNA)的应用方面。eDNA 有助于非侵入性的生态学研究,但也引入了额外的偏差和错误风险。为了有效应用,必须为每个分类群开发和验证 PCR 引物,并在每个系统中进行验证。我们概述了用于生态研究中 eDNA 分析的分类特异性引物的开发和验证的九个步骤框架,涉及参考数据库构建、目标基因的系统发育评估、引物设计、引物的计算机评估以及实验室评估引物的特异性、敏感性和实用性。我们的框架使得对可能的误差源进行严格评估成为可能。前五个步骤可以相对快速地进行,并且(在有参考 DNA 序列的情况下)需要最小的实验室资源,从而可以在进一步投资之前评估引物的适用性。第六至第八步需要更昂贵的实验室分析,但对于评估假阳性和假阴性结果的风险至关重要,而第九步则与野外实施有关。作为一个例子,我们已经开发并评估了从澳大利亚袋狸中特异性扩增线粒体 ND2 基因部分的引物。如果在引物开发的早期阶段采用我们的框架,将有助于从 eDNA 样本中大规模实施设计良好的 DNA 测试,以检测特定的野生动物。这将为研究人员和管理者提供对其数据的优势和局限性以及可以从中得出的结论的理解。