• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

军事骨科创伤登记处:一个特定专业的流程改进工具的潜力。

The Military Orthopedic Trauma Registry: The potential of a specialty specific process improvement tool.

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (J.C.R.), US Army Institute of Surgical Research and San Antonio Military Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas; US Army Institute of Surgical Research (R.M.G.), JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Joint Trauma System (M.A.S.), JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas; and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (A.E.J.), San Antonio Military Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Nov;81(5 Suppl 2 Proceedings of the 2015 Military Health System Research Symposium):S100-S103. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001145.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000001145
PMID:27768658
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Military Orthopaedic Trauma Registry (MOTR) was designed to replicate the Department of Defense Trauma Registry's (DoDTR's) role as pillar for data-driven management of extremity war wounds. The MOTR continuously undergoes quality assurance checks to optimize the registry data for future quality improvement efforts. We conducted a quality assurance survey of MOTR entrants to determine if a simple MOTR data pull could provide robust orthopedic-specific information toward the question of causes for late amputation.

METHODS

Forty-five entrants into the DoDTR with late transtibial amputation were sequentially abstracted into MOTR by MOTR data abstractors. The MOTR record was then examined by an independent reviewer for three data fields pertaining to the events leading up to the late amputation: injury before limb amputation, complications before and after amputation, and complication or other factor directly contributing to the decision for amputation.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine subjects had at least one fracture of the tibial diaphysis, tibial pilon, calcaneus, or multiple foot fractures. Twenty-nine fractures were described as open injuries for which 27 included a Gustilo and Anderson classification in the available data fields. Complications could be identified along the treatment course for 43 of the 45 entrants specific to the amputated limb. A directly contributing factor to late amputation was identified in 36 (80%) of the subjects. Infection, either alone or associated with fracture nonunion, was a contributing factor in 46% of late amputations. Wound infection was the most common complication both before and after the amputation.

CONCLUSION

The MOTR, using a simple data extraction from a few registry fields, can provide a robust amount of information that can direct process and care improvement for severely injured limbs by providing the level of detail pertinent to an orthopedic surgeon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic/epidemiological study, level IV.

摘要

背景

军事骨科创伤登记处(MOTR)旨在复制国防部创伤登记处(DoDTR)的作用,作为管理四肢战伤的数据驱动支柱。MOTR 不断进行质量保证检查,以优化登记处数据,为未来的质量改进工作提供支持。我们对 MOTR 参与者进行了质量保证调查,以确定简单的 MOTR 数据提取是否可以为导致晚期截肢的原因这一问题提供强有力的骨科特定信息。

方法

通过 MOTR 数据提取员,将 DoDTR 中 45 例晚期胫骨截肢患者连续纳入 MOTR。然后,由独立审查员检查 MOTR 记录,以了解导致晚期截肢的三个数据字段:截肢前的损伤、截肢前后的并发症以及直接导致截肢决定的并发症或其他因素。

结果

39 例患者至少有一处胫骨骨干、胫骨 pilon、跟骨或多处足部骨折。29 处骨折被描述为开放性损伤,其中 27 处可在可用数据字段中找到 Gustilo 和 Anderson 分类。45 例患者中有 43 例在截肢肢体的治疗过程中可以识别出并发症。36 例(80%)患者确定了导致晚期截肢的直接因素。感染是导致晚期截肢的一个因素,单独或与骨折不愈合相关,占晚期截肢的 46%。感染是截肢前后最常见的并发症。

结论

MOTR 通过从几个登记字段中简单提取数据,可以提供大量信息,通过提供与骨科医生相关的详细信息,为严重受伤的肢体提供流程和护理改进方向。

证据水平

预后/流行病学研究,IV 级。

相似文献

1
The Military Orthopedic Trauma Registry: The potential of a specialty specific process improvement tool.军事骨科创伤登记处:一个特定专业的流程改进工具的潜力。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Nov;81(5 Suppl 2 Proceedings of the 2015 Military Health System Research Symposium):S100-S103. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001145.
2
Military Orthopaedic Trauma Registry: Quality Data Now Available.军事骨科创伤登记处:现已提供高质量数据。
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2016 summer;25(2):89-92.
3
Popliteal artery repair in massively transfused military trauma casualties: a pursuit to save life and limb.大量输血的军事创伤伤员腘动脉修复:挽救生命与肢体的探索
J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69 Suppl 1:S123-34. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e44e6d.
4
The modern "deck-slap" injury--calcaneal blast fractures from vehicle explosions.现代的“甲板拍击伤”——车辆爆炸导致的跟骨爆震性骨折。
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1694-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318227a999.
5
Data-driven disaster management requires data: implementation of a military orthopaedic trauma registry.数据驱动的灾难管理需要数据:军事骨科创伤登记处的实施。
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011 Spring;20(1):56-61.
6
Acute bilateral leg amputation following combat injury in UK servicemen.英国军人在战斗受伤后急性双侧腿部截肢
Injury. 2014 Jul;45(7):1105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.01.025. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
7
Extremity injuries sustained by the UK military in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts: 2003-2014.2003年至2014年英国军队在伊拉克和阿富汗冲突中遭受的肢体损伤
Injury. 2017 Jul;48(7):1439-1443. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 17.
8
Predictors and timing of amputations in military lower extremity trauma with arterial injury.动脉损伤致军事下肢创伤截肢的预测因素和时间。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jul;87(1S Suppl 1):S172-S177. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002185.
9
A model to predict limb salvage in severe combat-related open calcaneus fractures.预测严重战创伤性开放性跟骨骨折保肢的模型。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Oct;472(10):3002-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3382-z.
10
Amputations in U.S. military personnel in the current conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq.美国军事人员在当前阿富汗和伊拉克冲突中的截肢情况。
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Jan;22(1):43-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815b35aa.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of North American orthopaedic trauma and fracture registries.北美骨科创伤与骨折登记系统综述。
OTA Int. 2025 Aug 12;8(4 Suppl):e390. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000390. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Utility of an orthopaedic trauma registry in Ghana.加纳矫形创伤登记处的实用性。
Ghana Med J. 2021 Sep;55(3):213-220. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v55i3.6.
3
Accuracy of institutional orthopedic trauma databases: a retrospective chart review.医疗机构创伤骨科数据库的准确性:回顾性图表审查。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jun 7;16(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02478-3.