Reichard Amanda, Stransky Michelle, Phillips Kimberly, McClain Monica, Drum Charles
Institute on Disability, University of New Hampshire, 10 West Edge Dr., Suite 101, Durham, NH 03824, USA.
Institute on Disability, University of New Hampshire, 10 West Edge Dr., Suite 101, Durham, NH 03824, USA.
Disabil Health J. 2017 Jan;10(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
While it is commonly accepted that disparities in unmet need for care vary by age, race/ethnicity, income, education, and access to care, literature documenting unmet needs experienced by adults with different types of disabilities is developing.
The main objective was to determine whether subgroups of people with disabilities are more likely than people without disabilities to delay/forgo necessary care, in general and among the insured.
We used pooled Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (2004-2010) to examine delaying or forgoing medical, dental, and pharmacy care among five disability subgroups (physical, cognitive, visual, hearing, multiple) and the non-disabled population. Logistic regression was conducted to examine delayed/forgone care, controlling for sociodemographic, health, and health care factors.
Over 13% of all working-age adults delayed/forwent necessary care; lack of insurance was the strongest predictor of unmet needs. Among the insured, disability subgroups were greater than two times more likely to report delayed/forgone care than adults without disabilities. Insured working-age adults with multiple chronic conditions and those with ADL/IADL assistance needs had higher odds of delayed or forgone care than their peers without these characteristics. Reasons related to affordability were most often listed as leading to unmet needs, regardless of disability.
Although insurance status most strongly predicted unmet needs for care, many people with insurance delayed/forewent necessary care. Even among the insured, all disability subgroups had significantly greater likelihood of having to delay/forgo care than those without disabilities. Differences also existed between the disability subgroups. Cost was most frequently cited reason for unmet needs.
虽然人们普遍认为未满足的护理需求差异因年龄、种族/族裔、收入、教育程度和获得护理的机会而异,但记录不同类型残疾成年人所经历的未满足需求的文献正在不断发展。
主要目的是确定残疾人群体是否比非残疾人群体更有可能推迟/放弃必要的护理,总体情况以及在参保人群中。
我们使用合并的医疗支出面板调查数据(2004 - 2010年)来研究五个残疾亚组(身体残疾、认知残疾、视力残疾、听力残疾、多重残疾)和非残疾人群中推迟或放弃医疗、牙科和药房护理的情况。进行逻辑回归以检查延迟/放弃的护理情况,并控制社会人口统计学、健康状况和医疗保健因素。
超过13%的所有工作年龄成年人推迟/放弃了必要的护理;缺乏保险是未满足需求的最强预测因素。在参保人群中,残疾亚组报告延迟/放弃护理的可能性比非残疾成年人高出两倍多。患有多种慢性病的参保工作年龄成年人以及有日常生活活动/工具性日常生活活动协助需求的成年人比没有这些特征的同龄人延迟或放弃护理的几率更高。无论残疾情况如何,与可负担性相关的原因最常被列为导致未满足需求的原因。
虽然保险状况最能强烈预测未满足的护理需求,但许多有保险的人推迟/放弃了必要的护理。即使在参保人群中,所有残疾亚组不得不延迟/放弃护理的可能性也明显高于非残疾人群体。残疾亚组之间也存在差异。成本是未满足需求最常被提及的原因。