Horner-Johnson Willi, Dobbertin Konrad, Lee Jae Chul, Andresen Elena M
Institute on Development and Disability, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec;49(6):1980-99. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12195. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
To examine differences in access to health care and receipt of clinical preventive services by type of disability among working-age adults with disabilities.
Secondary analysis of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data from 2002 to 2008.
We conducted cross-sectional logistic regression analyses comparing people with different types of disabilities on health insurance status and type; presence of a usual source of health care; delayed or forgone care; and receipt of dental checkups and cancer screening.
We pooled annualized MEPS data files across years. Our analytic sample consisted of adults (18-64 years) with physical, sensory, or cognitive disabilities and nonmissing data for all variables of interest.
Individuals with hearing impairment had better health care access and receipt than people with other disability types. People with multiple types of limitations were especially likely to have health care access problems and unmet health care needs.
There are differences in health care access and receipt of preventive care depending on what type of disability people have. More in-depth research is needed to identify specific causes of these disparities and assess interventions to address health care barriers for particular disability groups.
研究处于工作年龄段的残疾成年人在获得医疗保健服务以及接受临床预防服务方面因残疾类型不同而存在的差异。
对2002年至2008年医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)数据进行二次分析。
我们进行了横断面逻辑回归分析,比较不同残疾类型的人群在医疗保险状况和类型、是否有固定的医疗保健来源、延迟或放弃治疗以及接受牙科检查和癌症筛查方面的情况。
我们汇总了多年的年度MEPS数据文件。我们的分析样本包括18至64岁有身体、感官或认知残疾且所有感兴趣变量数据无缺失的成年人。
听力障碍患者在获得医疗保健服务和接受服务方面比其他残疾类型的人情况更好。有多种限制的人尤其容易出现医疗保健服务获取问题和未满足的医疗保健需求。
根据人们的残疾类型不同,在获得医疗保健服务和接受预防保健方面存在差异。需要进行更深入的研究,以确定这些差异的具体原因,并评估针对特定残疾群体解决医疗保健障碍的干预措施。