Yang B T, Wang Y Z, Sun F R, Dong J Y
Department of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Clin Radiol. 2017 Jan;72(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
To investigate the key imaging points in distinguishing ossifying inverted papilloma (IP) from polyps.
The native computed tomography (CT), conventional and enhanced MRI manifestations of 20 ossifying IPs and eight polyps, which were confirmed histopathologically, were retrospectively evaluated by two doctors majoring in head and neck imaging.
A significant difference was detected between the two entities for the involved sites (p<0.05). Although two lesions had similar CT findings, the MRI features differed significantly (p<0.05). Twenty ossifying IPs demonstrated heterogeneously isointense with moderate gadolinium enhancement, and a convoluted "cerebriform" configuration. Seven ossifying polyps revealed low T1 and high T2 signal, with marginal enhancement, and one showed isointense with moderate enhancement. The ossification appeared as oval or striped bone-like high attenuation, which consisted of peripheral hyperattenuating cortical bone and central fat-like attenuation of the medullary cavity. The corresponding MRI findings of the ossifying regions were peripherally low signal and centrally high signal on both T1- and T2-weighted images. The occurrence of two key MRI features of cystic appearance and the "cerebriform" sign were significantly different between two entities (p<0.05).
CT can better detect intralesional ossification, but MRI is the optimal imaging technique for discriminating between two disease entities.
探讨鉴别骨化性内翻性乳头状瘤(IP)与息肉的关键影像学要点。
回顾性分析20例经组织病理学证实的骨化性IP和8例息肉的平扫计算机断层扫描(CT)、常规及增强磁共振成像(MRI)表现,由两名头颈影像学专业医生进行评估。
两个病变实体在累及部位上存在显著差异(p<0.05)。尽管两种病变的CT表现相似,但MRI特征差异显著(p<0.05)。20例骨化性IP表现为不均匀等信号,钆增强中等,呈迂曲状 “脑回样” 形态。7例骨化性息肉表现为T1低信号、T2高信号,边缘强化,1例表现为等信号,强化中等。骨化表现为椭圆形或条纹状骨样高衰减,由周边高密度皮质骨和中央髓腔脂肪样衰减组成。骨化区域在T1加权像和T2加权像上的相应MRI表现为周边低信号、中央高信号。两种病变实体在囊性表现和 “脑回样” 征这两个关键MRI特征的出现上存在显著差异(p<0.05)。
CT能更好地检测病变内骨化,但MRI是鉴别这两种疾病实体的最佳影像学技术。