Awasthy Neeraj, Garg Ria, Radhakrishnan S, Shrivastava Savitri
Consultant, Department of Pediatrics and Congenital Heart Diseases, Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, Okhla road, Delhi 110025, India.
Fellow Department of Cardiology, Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, Okhla road, Delhi 110025, India.
Indian Heart J. 2016 Sep-Oct;68(5):604-611. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is a well accepted modality of treatment in congenital aortic stenosis in all age groups. Although in infants and children it is the modality of choice, in adolescents and young adults, it is of debatable efficacy.
To evaluate long-term results of aortic valvuloplasty particularly in adolescent and adults (>12 years) and compare the outcome in other age groups that are <1 year and between 1 are 11 years.
Tertiary referral center.
165 consecutive patients treated at the median age of 9 years (1 day to 64 years). The follow-up was up to 14 years (median 3 years). The whole cohort was divided into 3 age-based subgroups: Group A (<1 year) n=45, Group B (1 year-11 years) n=52, and Group C (>12 years) n=68. The characteristics of each subgroup were mutually compared.
Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty with mean (SD) balloon to annulus ratio of 0.93. Main outcome measures were repeat BAV, significant aortic regurgitation (AR), and aortic valve replacement/repair.
The incidence of significant AR from the whole cohort was 9.9% (8% moderate, 1.9% severe); n=16. Group A=significant AR 9.5% (7.1% moderate, 2.4% severe), Group B=significant AR 11.3% (9.4% moderate, 1.9% severe), and Group C=significant AR 9% (7.5% moderate, 1.5% severe); p value=0.99 (Group C vs Group A) and 0.92 (Group C vs Group B). Repeat BAV rate was 13.3% (n=22 out of 165 patients). Group A - n=5 (11.9%), Group B - n=10 (18.2%), and Group C - n=7 (10.3%). p Value=0.78 (C vs A) and 0.19 (C vs B). Surgery in follow-up was needed in n=4 (2.4%), none in Group A, 2 patients in Group B (3.6%), and 2 patients in group C (2.9%). Patients were followed up for a period of 14 years; Group A=up to 8 years, Group B=up to 13 years, and Group C=up to 14 years. Mean survival probability after the procedure was 8 years (Group A=6.5 years, Group B=8.1 years, and Group C=9.9 years), and p value=0.49 (A vs B), 0.23 (B vs C), and 0.4 (A vs C).
There is no statistical difference in the long-term outcome in the adults and adolescents as compared to the children; thus BAV remains an obvious treatment of choice with good long-term outcome.
球囊主动脉瓣成形术(BAV)是各年龄组先天性主动脉瓣狭窄公认的治疗方式。虽然在婴儿和儿童中它是首选治疗方式,但在青少年和年轻成人中,其疗效存在争议。
评估主动脉瓣成形术的长期结果,尤其是在青少年和成人(>12岁)中,并比较其与其他年龄组(<1岁和1至11岁)的结果。
三级转诊中心。
165例连续患者,中位年龄9岁(1天至64岁)。随访长达14年(中位3年)。整个队列分为3个基于年龄的亚组:A组(<1岁)n = 45,B组(1岁至11岁)n = 52,C组(>12岁)n = 68。对每个亚组的特征进行相互比较。
经皮球囊瓣膜成形术,球囊与瓣环平均(标准差)比例为0.93。主要结局指标为再次BAV、严重主动脉瓣反流(AR)以及主动脉瓣置换/修复。
整个队列中严重AR的发生率为9.9%(中度8%,重度1.9%);n = 16。A组严重AR发生率为9.5%(中度7.1%,重度2.4%),B组为11.3%(中度9.4%,重度1.9%),C组为9%(中度7.5%,重度1.5%);p值=0.99(C组与A组)和0.92(C组与B组)。再次BAV率为13.3%(165例患者中有22例)。A组 - n = 5(11.9%),B组 - n = 10(18.2%),C组 - n = 7(10.3%)。p值=0.78(C组与A组)和0.19(C组与B组)。随访期间需要手术治疗的有n = 4例(2.4%),A组无,B组2例(3.6%),C组2例(2.9%)。患者随访14年;A组最长8年,B组最长13年,C组最长14年。术后平均生存概率为8年(A组=6.5年,B组=8.1年,C组=9.9年),p值=0.49(A组与B组),0.23(B组与C组),0.4(A组与C组)。
与儿童相比,成人和青少年的长期结局无统计学差异;因此BAV仍然是具有良好长期结局的明显治疗选择。