Troche Stefan J, Herzberg Philipp Yorck
Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Personality Psychology and Psychological Assessment, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Helmut-Schmidt-University/University of the Federal Armed Forces, Hamburg, Germany.
Aggress Behav. 2017 May;43(3):251-262. doi: 10.1002/ab.21685. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
Malamuth's (1998) confluence model holds that the combination of hostile masculinity, impersonal sexuality, and the constellation of high dominance and low nurturance plays a crucial role in explaining men's sexual aggression against women. Most studies on the confluence model concentrate on hostile masculinity and impersonal sexuality rather than dominance and nurturance. Using a person-centered approach, we investigated whether sexual aggressive men could be better identified in a sample of 692 men when not only hostile masculinity and impersonal sexuality but also dominance and nurturance were used as indicators in a latent profile analysis. Regardless of whether dominance and nurturance were considered or not, latent profile analyses revealed a high-risk group, which showed higher sexual aggression than other groups. In both cases, the sensitivity (i.e., the proportion of sexually aggressive men correctly assigned to the high-risk group) was low (33% and 31%, respectively) but increased substantially for the identification of severe sexual aggression. The positive prediction value, however, increased from 68% to 78% when dominance and nurturance were considered as predictor variables in addition to hostile masculinity and impersonal sexuality, indicating that more men assigned to the high-risk group were indeed sexually aggressive. These results demonstrate the power of the confluence model for identifying sexually aggressive men from a person-centered perspective. They also point to the necessity of expanding this perspective by considering further (e.g., situational) risk factors, which have previously been identified as predicting sexually aggressive behavior in men. Aggr. Behav. 43:251-262, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
马拉穆思（1998年）的融合模型认为，敌对男性气质、非个人化的性观念以及高支配欲和低养育欲的组合在解释男性对女性的性侵犯行为中起着关键作用。大多数关于融合模型的研究都集中在敌对男性气质和非个人化的性观念上，而非支配欲和养育欲。我们采用以个体为中心的方法，在一个由692名男性组成的样本中进行研究，探讨在潜在剖面分析中，当不仅将敌对男性气质和非个人化的性观念，而且将支配欲和养育欲用作指标时，是否能更好地识别有性侵犯行为的男性。无论是否考虑支配欲和养育欲，潜在剖面分析都揭示了一个高风险组，该组表现出比其他组更高的性侵犯倾向。在这两种情况下，敏感性（即被正确归为高风险组的有性侵犯行为男性的比例）都很低（分别为33%和31%），但在识别严重性侵犯行为时大幅提高。然而，当除了敌对男性气质和非个人化的性观念外，还将支配欲和养育欲作为预测变量时，阳性预测值从68%提高到了78%，这表明被归为高风险组的男性中确实有更多人有性侵犯行为。这些结果证明了融合模型从以个体为中心的角度识别有性侵犯行为男性的能力。它们还指出了通过考虑更多（如情境）风险因素来扩展这一视角的必要性，这些因素此前已被确定为男性性侵犯行为的预测因素。《攻击行为》43:251 - 262，2017年。© 2016威利期刊公司
