Suppr超能文献

诊断急性胰腺炎——血清脂肪酶未三倍增高患者的临床和影像学特征。

Diagnosing acute pancreatitis-Clinical and radiological characterisation of patients without threefold increase of serum lipase.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2017 Oct;95:278-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.08.038. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosing acute pancreatitis (AP) may be challenging in patients with acute abdominal pain but missing threefold increased serum lipase levels (Lip-). This studyaims both to characterize these patients using clinical, radiological and mortality data, and to assess the group of patients who need contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).

METHODS

In this retrospective, IRB approved study 234 consecutive patients with AP were investigated. Inclusion criteria were single (SAP) and recurrent attacks (RAP) of AP and CECT ≥72h after onset of symptoms. Severity of AP was assessed by C-reactive protein at 48h after hospital admission and using 3 CT-based scores (CTSI, mCTSI, EPIC) by 2 observers. Mortality rates from pancreatic and non-pancreatic causes were noted with regard to lipase increase. Results were compared with paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

64/234 (27%) patients belonged to Lip- group and 170/234 (73%) patients were allocated to Lip+ group. Significantly more male patients (78% in Lip- vs. 63% in Lip+, p<0.05) with RAP (63% in Lip- vs. 21% in Lip+, p<0.001) were observed in the Lip- group. EPIC was significantly lower in Lip- group compared to Lip+ group (3(IQR 2-5) vs. 2(IQR 1-3), p<0.001). Mortality from pancreatic and non-pancreatic causes was comparable in Lip- and Lip+ group (pancreatic causes: 9% vs. 6%, p=0.60; nonpancreatic causes: 8% vs. 5%, p=0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

27% of all patients with AP presented without threefold increase of lipase levels. Thus, they would be underdiagnosed without confirming CECT, which revealed significantly lower counts of pleural effusions and ascites. Male patients with RAP were found significantly more often among the Lip- group. Hence, they would benefit the most from CECT for diagnosing AP.

摘要

目的

在伴有急性腹痛的患者中,诊断急性胰腺炎(AP)可能具有挑战性,但血清脂肪酶水平升高三倍(Lip+)的情况并不常见。本研究旨在通过临床、影像学和死亡率数据来描述这些患者的特征,并评估需要进行增强 CT 扫描(CECT)的患者群体。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 234 例连续的 AP 患者。纳入标准为单发性(SAP)和复发性(RAP)AP 以及症状发作后 72 小时内进行 CECT。入院后 48 小时通过 C 反应蛋白评估 AP 严重程度,并由 2 位观察者使用 3 种基于 CT 的评分(CTSI、mCTSI、EPIC)进行评估。记录胰腺和非胰腺原因导致的死亡率。并将结果与配对 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行比较。

结果

234 例患者中,64 例(27%)属于 Lip-组,170 例(73%)属于 Lip+组。Lip-组中男性患者比例显著较高(78% vs. 63%,p<0.05),且 RAP 更为常见(63% vs. 21%,p<0.001)。与 Lip+组相比,Lip-组的 EPIC 评分明显更低(3(IQR 2-5)vs. 2(IQR 1-3),p<0.001)。胰腺和非胰腺原因导致的死亡率在 Lip-组和 Lip+组之间无显著差异(胰腺原因:9% vs. 6%,p=0.60;非胰腺原因:8% vs. 5%,p=0.58)。

结论

所有 AP 患者中有 27%的患者血清脂肪酶水平没有升高三倍。因此,如果不进行 CECT 确认,这些患者可能会被漏诊,而 CECT 可以显示出明显更少的胸腔积液和腹水。在 Lip-组中,RAP 男性患者的比例显著较高。因此,他们最需要 CECT 来诊断 AP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验