Cardiothoracic Directorate, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals. NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Instituto de Ciencias del Corazón (ICICOR), Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain; Department of Medicine, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Cardiothoracic Directorate, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals. NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jan;36(1):42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
This study examined whether aortic valve opening (AVO) and other echocardiographic parameters influence outcomes in patients on left ventricular (LV) assist device (LVAD) support. Pump thrombosis (PT) and ischemic stroke (IS) are known complications of LVAD, but mechanisms that could influence them are not completely understood.
This was a retrospective analysis of 147 patients who received a HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device ( HeartWare International) as a bridge to transplant or to candidacy between July 2009 and August 2015, of whom 126 had at least 30 days of follow-up before the first event (30-days-out cohort). Outcomes included survival, PT, IS, and PT+IS (combined thrombotic event; CTE).
Median time on support was 518 days. Of the 30-days-out cohort, 29% had a first PT and 19% a first IS. AVO was associated with longer survival on device (1,081 vs 723 days; p = 0.01) in the entire cohort. In the 30-days-out cohort, the aortic valve was more frequently closed in patients with lower ejection fractions on support (14% ± 6% vs 18% ± 9%; p = 0.009), more dilated pre-event echocardiogram (LV end-diastolic diameter, 66 ± 12 mm vs 62 ± 10 mm; p = 0.04), and pre-implant LV end-diastolic diameter (70 ± 10 mm vs 66 ± 9 mm; p = 0.06). CTE-free survival on the device was lower with a closed aortic valve (897 vs 1,314 days; p = 0.003) as was PT-free survival on the device (1,070 vs 1,457 days; p = 0.02). Cox regression analysis showed that AVO was an independent predictor of CTE (p = 0.03) CONCLUSIONS: Thrombotic events are relatively frequent in patients on long-term LVAD support. A closed aortic valve was associated with decreased overall survival, thrombosis-free survival, and poorer LV function on support. These are high-risk patients, so whether they require more intense anti-coagulation or prioritizing for transplantation requires further research.
本研究旨在探讨主动脉瓣开放(AVO)和其他超声心动图参数是否会影响左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持患者的结局。泵血栓形成(PT)和缺血性卒中(IS)是 LVAD 的已知并发症,但影响这些并发症的机制尚不完全清楚。
这是一项回顾性分析,纳入了 2009 年 7 月至 2015 年 8 月期间接受 HeartWare 心室辅助装置(HeartWare International)作为桥接移植或候选者的 147 例患者,其中 126 例在首次事件前至少有 30 天的随访(30 天随访队列)。结局包括生存率、PT、IS 和 PT+IS(联合血栓事件;CTE)。
中位支持时间为 518 天。在 30 天随访队列中,29%的患者首次发生 PT,19%的患者首次发生 IS。在整个队列中,AVO 与更长的装置生存时间相关(1081 天 vs 723 天;p = 0.01)。在 30 天随访队列中,在支持期间射血分数较低的患者中,主动脉瓣更常关闭(14%±6% vs 18%±9%;p = 0.009),术前超声心动图显示左心室舒张末期直径更大(66 ± 12 mm vs 62 ± 10 mm;p = 0.04),术前左心室舒张末期直径更大(70 ± 10 mm vs 66 ± 9 mm;p = 0.06)。在装置上,主动脉瓣关闭时 CTE 无事件生存率较低(897 天 vs 1314 天;p = 0.003),PT 无事件生存率也较低(1070 天 vs 1457 天;p = 0.02)。Cox 回归分析显示,AVO 是 CTE 的独立预测因素(p = 0.03)。
在接受长期 LVAD 支持的患者中,血栓形成事件相对频繁。主动脉瓣关闭与总生存率、血栓形成无事件生存率和支持期间左心室功能恶化相关。这些是高危患者,因此他们是否需要更强化的抗凝治疗或优先考虑移植,需要进一步研究。