Suppr超能文献

微创烧伤护理:一项关于使用基于菠萝蛋白酶的清创酶(Nexobrid®)进行快速选择性清创的七项临床研究综述。

Minimally invasive burn care: a review of seven clinical studies of rapid and selective debridement using a bromelain-based debriding enzyme (Nexobrid®).

作者信息

Rosenberg L, Shoham Y, Krieger Y, Rubin G, Sander F, Koller J, David K, Egosi D, Ahuja R, Singer A J

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the burn Unit, Soroka University medical Centre, Faculty of health Sciences, ben-Gurion University, beer-Sheva, israel; Cleft Lip and Palate and Craniofacial Deformities Unit, Department of Plastic Surgery, meir hospital, kfar Saba, israel; Clinical and medical Departments, mediWound LTD, Yavneh, israel.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the burn Unit, Soroka University medical Centre, Faculty of health Sciences, ben-Gurion University, beer-Sheva, israel.

出版信息

Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2015 Dec 31;28(4):264-274.

Abstract

Current surgical and non-surgical eschar removal-debridement techniques are invasive or ineffective. A bromelainbased rapid and selective enzymatic debriding agent was developed to overcome these disadvantages and compared with the standard of care (SOC). The safety and efficacy of a novel Debriding Gel Dressing (DGD) was determined in patients with deep partial and full thickness burns covering up to 67% total body surface area (TBSA). This review summarizes data from seven studies, four of which were randomized clinical trials that included a SOC or control vehicle. DGD eschar debridement efficacy was >90% in all studies, comparable to the SOC and significantly greater than the control vehicle. The total area excised was less in patients treated with DGD compared with the control vehicle (22.9% vs. 73.2%, P<0.001) or the surgical/non-surgical SOC (50.5%, P=0.006). The incidence of surgical debridement in patients treated with DGD was lower than the SOC (40/163 [24.5%] vs. 119/170 [70.0%], P0.001). Less autografting was used in all studies. Long-term scar quality and function were similar in DGD- and SOCtreated. DGD is a safe and effective method of burn debridement that offers an alternative to surgical and non-surgical SOC.

摘要

当前的手术和非手术焦痂清除——清创技术具有侵入性或效果不佳。一种基于菠萝蛋白酶的快速选择性酶促清创剂被研发出来以克服这些缺点,并与护理标准(SOC)进行了比较。在全身表面积(TBSA)覆盖高达67%的深度部分和全层烧伤患者中确定了一种新型清创凝胶敷料(DGD)的安全性和有效性。本综述总结了七项研究的数据,其中四项为随机临床试验,包括SOC或对照载体。在所有研究中,DGD焦痂清创效果>90%,与SOC相当且显著优于对照载体。与对照载体(22.9%对73.2%,P<0.001)或手术/非手术SOC(50.5%,P=0.006)相比,接受DGD治疗的患者切除的总面积更少。接受DGD治疗的患者手术清创的发生率低于SOC(40/163[24.5%]对119/170[70.0%],P<0.001)。在所有研究中使用的自体移植更少。DGD治疗组和SOC治疗组的长期瘢痕质量和功能相似。DGD是一种安全有效的烧伤清创方法,为手术和非手术SOC提供了一种替代方案。

相似文献

2
A novel rapid and selective enzymatic debridement agent for burn wound management: a multi-center RCT.
Burns. 2014 May;40(3):466-74. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
4
Selectivity of a bromelain based enzymatic debridement agent: a porcine study.
Burns. 2012 Nov;38(7):1035-40. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
5
Early Enzymatic Burn Debridement: Results of the DETECT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Burn Care Res. 2024 Mar 4;45(2):297-307. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad142.
8
Enzymatic debridement for circumferential deep burns: the role of surgical escharotomy.
Burns. 2023 Mar;49(2):304-309. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.12.003. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
9
Enzymatic debridement: past, present, and future.
Acta Chir Belg. 2022 Aug;122(4):279-295. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2022.2068746. Epub 2022 May 4.
10
Rapid enzymatic burn debridement: A review of the paediatric clinical trial experience.
Int Wound J. 2020 Oct;17(5):1337-1345. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13405. Epub 2020 May 22.

引用本文的文献

3
Pain Management in Burned Patients Treated with Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement.
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 26;14(5):1571. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051571.
6
Bromelain in Burn Care: Advancements in Enzymatic Debridement and Patient Outcomes.
Eur Burn J. 2024 Dec 12;5(4):438-453. doi: 10.3390/ebj5040039.
8
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ENZYMATIC DEBRIDEMENT VERSUS STANDARD BURN CARE: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS.
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2024 Jun 30;37(2):148-158. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Enzymatic Debridement (Nexobrid) on Burned Hands: Retrospective Review from a Burn Referral Center in Spain.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jun 10;12(6):e5886. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005886. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Local Anaesthesia for Enzymatic Debridement of Cutaneous Burns: A Prospective Analysis of 27 Cases.
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2023 Mar 31;36(1):74-78. eCollection 2023 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
A novel rapid and selective enzymatic debridement agent for burn wound management: a multi-center RCT.
Burns. 2014 May;40(3):466-74. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
2
Selectivity of a bromelain based enzymatic debridement agent: a porcine study.
Burns. 2012 Nov;38(7):1035-40. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
3
Efficacy of enzymatic debridement of deeply burned hands.
Burns. 2012 Feb;38(1):108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
4
Reepithelialization of mid-dermal porcine burns after rapid enzymatic debridement with Debrase®.
J Burn Care Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):647-53. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31822dc467.
5
8
Combined ultrasonic and enzymatic debridement of necrotic eschars in an animal model.
J Burn Care Res. 2009 May-Jun;30(3):505-13. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181a28d89.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验