Suppr超能文献

测试成功的护理管理项目的可重复性:一项随机试验的结果以及影响未能重现的可能原因。

Testing the Replicability of a Successful Care Management Program: Results from a Randomized Trial and Likely Explanations for Why Impacts Did Not Replicate.

作者信息

Peterson G Greg, Zurovac Jelena, Brown Randall S, Coburn Kenneth D, Markovich Patricia A, Marcantonio Sherry A, Clark William D, Mutti Anne, Stepanczuk Cara

机构信息

Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC.

Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51(6):2115-2139. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12595. Epub 2016 Oct 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To test whether a care management program could replicate its success in an earlier trial and determine likely explanations for why it did not.

DATA SOURCES/SETTING: Medicare claims and nurse contact data for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with chronic illnesses enrolled in the trial in eastern Pennsylvania (N = 483).

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized trial with half of enrollees receiving intensive care management services and half receiving usual care. We developed and tested hypotheses for why impacts declined.

DATA EXTRACTION

All outcomes and covariates were derived from claims and the nurse contact data.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

From 2010 to 2014, the program did not reduce hospitalizations or generate Medicare savings to offset program fees that averaged $260 per beneficiary per month. These estimates are statistically different (p < .05) from the large reductions in hospitalizations and spending in the first trial (2002-2010). The treatment-control differences in the second trial disappeared because the control group's risk-adjusted hospitalization rate improved, not because the treatment group's outcomes worsened.

CONCLUSION

Even if demonstrated in a randomized trial, successful results from one test may not replicate in other settings or time periods. Assessing whether gaps in care that the original program filled exist in other settings can help identify where earlier success is likely to replicate.

摘要

目的

测试一项护理管理项目能否在早期试验中复制其成功经验,并确定其未能成功的可能原因。

数据来源/背景:宾夕法尼亚州东部参加该试验的患有慢性病的医疗保险按服务收费受益人的医疗保险理赔数据和护士联系数据(N = 483)。

研究设计

一项随机试验,一半参与者接受强化护理管理服务,另一半接受常规护理。我们针对影响下降的原因提出并检验了假设。

数据提取

所有结果和协变量均来自理赔数据和护士联系数据。

主要发现

2010年至2014年期间,该项目并未减少住院次数,也未节省医疗保险费用以抵消平均每月每位受益人260美元的项目费用。这些估计值与首次试验(2002 - 2010年)中住院次数和支出的大幅减少在统计学上存在差异(p < 0.05)。第二次试验中治疗组与对照组的差异消失,是因为对照组经风险调整后的住院率有所改善,而非治疗组的结果变差。

结论

即使在随机试验中得到证实,一项试验的成功结果也可能无法在其他环境或时间段中复制。评估在其他环境中是否存在原始项目所填补的护理差距,有助于确定早期成功可能复制的地点。

相似文献

3
Evaluating care coordination among Medicare beneficiaries.
JAMA. 2009 Jun 24;301(24):2547-8; author reply 2548. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.873.
4
High-Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jan;68(1):70-77. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16146. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
7
Hospice Use, Hospitalization, and Medicare Spending at the End of Life.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 May;71(3):569-80. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv109. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
8
The elusive quest for quality and cost savings in the Medicare program.
JAMA. 2009 Feb 11;301(6):668-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.91.
9
Spending differences associated with the Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration.
JAMA. 2012 Sep 12;308(10):1015-23. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.10812.
10
Primary care physician workforce and Medicare beneficiaries' health outcomes.
JAMA. 2011 May 25;305(20):2096-104. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.665.

引用本文的文献

1
Community care coordination for stroke survivors: results of a complex intervention study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 19;20(1):1143. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05993-x.
3
Best of the 2016 AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting.
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51(6):2053-2055. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12620.

本文引用的文献

1
Readmissions, Observation, and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 21;374(16):1543-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1513024. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
2
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
4
Effects of a Medical Home and Shared Savings Intervention on Quality and Utilization of Care.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1362-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2047.
6
Patient-centered medical home initiatives expanded in 2009-13: providers, patients, and payment incentives increased.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Oct;33(10):1823-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0351.
8
Quality improvement of care transitions and the trend of composite hospital care.
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1013-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.509.
10
How to use a subgroup analysis: users' guide to the medical literature.
JAMA. 2014;311(4):405-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.285063.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验