• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险受益人的高需求表型:利用和结果变化的驱动因素。

High-Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes.

机构信息

Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University, School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University, School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jan;68(1):70-77. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16146. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.16146
PMID:31454082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6952536/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

High-need (HN) Medicare beneficiaries heavily use healthcare services at a high cost. This population is heterogeneous, composed of individuals with varying degrees of medical complexity and healthcare needs. To improve healthcare delivery and decrease costs, it is critical to identify the subpopulations present within this population. We aimed to (1) identify distinct clinical phenotypes present within HN Medicare beneficiaries, and (2) examine differences in outcomes between phenotypes.

DESIGN

Latent class analysis was used to identify phenotypes within a sample of HN fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older using Medicare claims and post-acute assessment data.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PARTICIPANTS

Two cross-sectional cohorts were used to identify phenotypes. Cohorts included FFS Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older who survived through 2014 (n = 415 659) and 2015 (n = 416 643).

MEASUREMENTS

The following variables were used to identify phenotypes: acute and post-acute care use, functional dependency in one or more activities of daily living, presence of six or more chronic conditions, and complex chronic conditions. Mortality, hospitalizations, healthcare expenditures, and days in the community were compared between phenotypes.

RESULTS

Five phenotypes were identified: (1) comorbid ischemic heart disease with hospitalization and skilled nursing facility use (22% of the HN sample), (2) comorbid ischemic heart disease with home care use (23%), (3) home care use (12%), (4) high comorbidity with hospitalization (32%), and (5) Alzheimer's disease/related dementias with functional dependency and nursing home use (11%). Mortality was highest in phenotypes 1 and 2; hospitalizations and expenditures were highest in phenotypes 1, 3, and 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings represent a first step toward classifying the heterogeneity among HN Medicare beneficiaries. Further work is needed to identify modifiable utilization patterns between phenotypes to improve the value of healthcare provided to these subpopulations. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:70-77, 2019.

摘要

目的

高需求(HN)医疗保险受益人大量使用医疗服务,费用高昂。这一人群具有异质性,由具有不同程度医疗复杂性和医疗需求的个体组成。为了改善医疗服务的提供并降低成本,关键是要确定该人群中存在的亚人群。我们旨在:(1)确定 HN 医疗保险受益人群中存在的不同临床表型,以及(2)检查表型之间的结果差异。

设计

使用潜在类别分析,根据医疗保险索赔和康复后评估数据,确定年龄在 65 岁及以上的 HN 按服务项目付费(FFS)医疗保险受益人群中的表型。

地点

不适用。

参与者

使用两个横截面队列来确定表型。队列包括在 2014 年(n=415659)和 2015 年(n=416643)期间存活下来的年龄在 65 岁及以上的 FFS 医疗保险受益人。

测量

用于确定表型的变量包括:急性和康复后护理使用、一项或多项日常生活活动的功能依赖、存在六种或更多种慢性疾病、以及复杂的慢性疾病。在表型之间比较死亡率、住院率、医疗支出和在社区的天数。

结果

确定了 5 种表型:(1)合并缺血性心脏病伴住院和熟练护理机构使用(HN 样本的 22%),(2)合并缺血性心脏病伴家庭护理使用(23%),(3)家庭护理使用(12%),(4)高合并症伴住院(32%),以及(5)阿尔茨海默病/相关痴呆伴功能依赖和疗养院使用(11%)。表型 1 和 2 的死亡率最高;表型 1、3 和 4 的住院率和支出最高。

结论

我们的发现代表了对 HN 医疗保险受益人群进行分类的第一步。需要进一步研究以确定表型之间可改变的利用模式,从而提高向这些亚人群提供的医疗服务的价值。美国老年学会杂志 68:70-77,2019 年。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cf0/7004144/82fbade22667/JGS-68-70-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cf0/7004144/82fbade22667/JGS-68-70-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cf0/7004144/82fbade22667/JGS-68-70-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
High-Need Phenotypes in Medicare Beneficiaries: Drivers of Variation in Utilization and Outcomes.医疗保险受益人的高需求表型:利用和结果变化的驱动因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jan;68(1):70-77. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16146. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
2
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 2. The Trajectories of Sepsis, 2012-2018.医疗保险受益人群中的脓毒症:2. 2012-2018 年脓毒症的轨迹。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):289-301. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004226.
3
Patient Outcomes After Hospital Discharge to Home With Home Health Care vs to a Skilled Nursing Facility.患者出院后居家接受家庭保健护理与入住专业护理机构的结局比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 1;179(5):617-623. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7998.
4
Leveraging survey and claims data to identify high-need Medicare beneficiaries in the National Health and Aging Trends Study.利用调查和索赔数据在国家健康老龄化趋势研究中识别高需求的 Medicare 受益人。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Feb;70(2):522-530. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17517. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
5
Comparing post-acute rehabilitation use, length of stay, and outcomes experienced by Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with hip fracture in the United States: A secondary analysis of administrative data.比较美国 Medicare 按服务收费和 Medicare Advantage 受益人与髋部骨折相关的康复使用、住院时间和康复结局:基于行政数据的二次分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jun 26;15(6):e1002592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002592. eCollection 2018 Jun.
6
A comparison by payor/provider type of the cost of dying among frail older adults.按付款人/提供者类型对体弱老年人临终成本进行的比较。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Sep;44(9):1098-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb02947.x.
7
Post-Acute Care Locations: Hospital Discharge Destination Reports vs Medicare Claims.康复护理地点:医院出院去向报告与医疗保险索赔。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):847-851. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16308. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
8
Changes in Health Care Costs and Mortality Associated With Transitional Care Management Services After a Discharge Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人出院后与过渡性护理管理服务相关的医疗保健成本和死亡率变化
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1165-1171. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2572.
9
Home Health Care After Skilled Nursing Facility Discharge Following Heart Failure Hospitalization.心力衰竭住院后出院到专业护理机构后的家庭保健。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jan;68(1):96-102. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16179. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
10
Mortality, Hospitalizations, and Expenditures for the Medicare Population Aged 65 Years or Older, 1999-2013.1999 - 2013年65岁及以上医疗保险人群的死亡率、住院率和费用支出
JAMA. 2015 Jul 28;314(4):355-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8035.

引用本文的文献

1
Rectal spacer use and overall long-term healthcare costs: payer perspective.直肠间隔物的使用与长期总体医疗保健成本:支付方视角
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 12;15:1654925. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1654925. eCollection 2025.
2
End-of-Life Care and Health Care Spending for Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia in Accountable Care Organizations.责任医疗组织中患有痴呆症的医疗保险受益人的临终关怀与医疗保健支出
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 May 2;6(5):e250731. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0731.
3
Place of care in the last three years of life for Medicare beneficiaries.

本文引用的文献

1
A Retrospective Study of Administrative Data to Identify High-Need Medicare Beneficiaries at Risk of Dying and Being Hospitalized.基于行政数据的回顾性研究:识别高医疗需求的 Medicare 受益人群,这些人有死亡和住院的风险。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Mar;34(3):405-411. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4781-3. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
2
Subgroups of High-Cost Medicare Advantage Patients: an Observational Study.高成本医疗保险优势患者亚组:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Feb;34(2):218-225. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4759-1. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
3
Identifying Latent Subgroups of High-Risk Patients Using Risk Score Trajectories.
医疗保险受益人生命最后三年的护理地点。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 25;24(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04610-w.
4
Patterns of Morbidity Across the Lifespan: A Population Segmentation Framework for Classifying Health Care Needs for All Ages.全生命周期发病模式:一个用于分类各年龄段医疗保健需求的人群细分框架。
Med Care. 2024 Nov 1;62(11):732-740. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001898. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
5
Identifying common patterns of health services use: a longitudinal study of older Swiss adults' care trajectories.识别卫生服务使用的常见模式:对瑞士老年成年人护理轨迹的纵向研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 26;22(1):1586. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08987-z.
6
Pain Impacting Quality of Life in Persons with Dementia Dying in the Nursing Home by Alternative Medicare Payment Model.在养老院中,通过替代医疗保险支付模式,临终的痴呆症患者的疼痛对生活质量的影响。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Dec;25(12):1795-1801. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0047. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
7
Identifying subgroups of adult high-cost health care users: a retrospective analysis.识别成年高医疗费用使用者亚组:一项回顾性分析。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Apr 19;10(2):E390-E399. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210265. Print 2022 Apr-Jun.
8
The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Alzheimer's Disease.阿尔茨海默病的人文及经济负担
Neurol Ther. 2022 Jun;11(2):525-551. doi: 10.1007/s40120-022-00335-x. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
9
Empiric segmentation of high-risk patients: a structured literature review.经验性高危患者的分段:系统文献回顾。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Feb 1;28(2):e69-e77. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88752.
10
Healthcare utilization and costs among high-need and frail Mexican American Medicare beneficiaries.高需求及体弱的墨西哥裔美国医疗保险受益人的医疗保健利用情况及费用
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0262079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262079. eCollection 2022.
利用风险评分轨迹识别高危患者的潜在亚组。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):2120-2126. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4653-x. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
4
Segmentation of High-Cost Adults in an Integrated Healthcare System Based on Empirical Clustering of Acute and Chronic Conditions.基于急性和慢性疾病实证聚类的综合医疗保健系统中高费用成人的细分
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):2171-2179. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4626-0. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
5
Evaluation of Analysis Approaches for Latent Class Analysis with Auxiliary Linear Growth Model.具有辅助线性增长模型的潜在类别分析的分析方法评估
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 22;9:130. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00130. eCollection 2018.
6
Concentration of Potentially Preventable Spending Among High-Cost Medicare Subpopulations: An Observational Study.高成本 Medicare 亚人群中潜在可预防支出的集中程度:一项观察性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Nov 21;167(10):706-713. doi: 10.7326/M17-0767. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
7
Focusing on High-Cost Patients - The Key to Addressing High Costs?关注高成本患者——解决高成本问题的关键?
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 2;376(9):807-809. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1612779.
8
Segmenting high-cost Medicare patients into potentially actionable cohorts.将高成本 Medicare 患者细分到潜在可操作队列中。
Healthc (Amst). 2017 Mar;5(1-2):62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
9
Caring for High-Need, High-Cost Patients - An Urgent Priority.关爱高需求、高成本患者——一项紧迫的优先任务。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 8;375(10):909-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1608511. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
10
High-Need, High-Cost Patients: Who Are They and How Do They Use Health Care? A Population-Based Comparison of Demographics, Health Care Use, and Expenditures.高需求、高成本患者:他们是谁以及如何使用医疗服务?基于人群的人口统计学、医疗服务使用情况和支出比较。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Aug;26:1-14.