Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jan;45(1):63-74. doi: 10.1111/apt.13831. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
Patient education forms a cornerstone of management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The Internet has opened new avenues for information gathering.
To determine the relationship between different information sources and patient knowledge and anxiety in patients with IBD.
The use of information sources in patients with IBD was examined via questionnaire. Anxiety was assessed with the hospital anxiety and depression scale and disease-related patient knowledge with the Crohn's and colitis knowledge score questionnaires. Associations between these outcomes and demographics, disease-related factors, and use of different information sources were analysed using linear regression analysis.
Of 307 patients (165 Crohn's disease, 142 ulcerative colitis) 60.6% were female. Participants used the hospital IBD team (82.3%), official leaflets (59.5%), and official websites (53.5%) most frequently in contrast to alternative health websites (9%). University education (P < 0.001), use of immunosuppressants (P = 0.025), Crohn's and Colitis UK membership (P = 0.001), frequent use of the hospital IBD team (P = 0.032), and frequent use of official information websites (P = 0.005) were associated with higher disease-related patient knowledge. Female sex (P = 0.004), clinically active disease (P < 0.001), frequent use of general practitioners (P = 0.014), alternative health websites (homoeopathy, nutritionists, etc.) (P = 0.004) and random links (P = 0.016) were independently associated with higher anxiety.
Different patient information sources are associated with better knowledge or worse anxiety levels. Face-to-face education and written information materials remain the first line of patient education. Patients should be guided towards official information websites and warned about the association between the use of alternative health websites or random links and anxiety.
患者教育是炎症性肠病(IBD)管理的基石。互联网为信息收集开辟了新途径。
确定不同信息来源与 IBD 患者的知识和焦虑之间的关系。
通过问卷调查检查 IBD 患者的信息来源使用情况。使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表评估焦虑,使用克罗恩病和结肠炎知识评分问卷评估与疾病相关的患者知识。使用线性回归分析分析这些结果与人口统计学、疾病相关因素以及使用不同信息来源之间的关系。
在 307 名患者(165 例克罗恩病,142 例溃疡性结肠炎)中,60.6%为女性。与替代健康网站(9%)相比,参与者最常使用医院 IBD 团队(82.3%)、官方传单(59.5%)和官方网站(53.5%)。大学教育(P<0.001)、使用免疫抑制剂(P=0.025)、英国克罗恩病和结肠炎协会会员资格(P=0.001)、频繁使用医院 IBD 团队(P=0.032)和频繁使用官方信息网站(P=0.005)与更高的疾病相关患者知识相关。女性(P=0.004)、临床活动疾病(P<0.001)、经常使用全科医生(P=0.014)、替代健康网站(顺势疗法、营养师等)(P=0.004)和随机链接(P=0.016)与更高的焦虑水平独立相关。
不同的患者信息来源与更好的知识或更差的焦虑水平相关。面对面教育和书面信息材料仍然是患者教育的第一线。应指导患者访问官方信息网站,并警告他们使用替代健康网站或随机链接与焦虑之间的关联。