Suppr超能文献

单节段颈椎融合手术中脊柱外科医生的差异:成本与医院资源利用分析

Spinal Surgeon Variation in Single-Level Cervical Fusion Procedures: A Cost and Hospital Resource Utilization Analysis.

作者信息

Hijji Fady Y, Massel Dustin H, Mayo Benjamin C, Narain Ankur S, Long William W, Modi Krishna D, Burke Rory M, Canar Jeff, Singh Kern

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

Department of Health Systems Management, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 1;42(13):1031-1038. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001962.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative costs and outcomes of patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDF) at both a service (orthopedic vs. neurosurgical) and individual surgeon level.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Hospital systems are experiencing significant pressure to increase value of care by reducing costs while maintaining or improving patient-centered outcomes. Few studies have examined the cost-effectiveness cervical arthrodesis at a service level.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent a primary 1-level ACDF by eight surgeons (four orthopedic and four neurosurgical) at a single academic institution between 2013 and 2015 was performed. Patients were identified by Diagnosis-Related Group and procedural codes. Patients with the ninth revision of the International Classification of Diseases coding for degenerative cervical pathology were included. Patients were excluded if they exhibited preoperative diagnoses or postoperative social work issues affecting their length of stay. Comparisons of preoperative demographics were performed using Student t tests and chi-squared analysis. Perioperative outcomes and costs for hospital services were compared using multivariate regression adjusted for preoperative characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients diagnosed with cervical degeneration underwent single-level ACDF; 44 and 93 were performed by orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons, respectively. There was no difference in patient demographics. ACDF procedures performed by orthopedic surgeons demonstrated shorter operative times (89.1 ± 25.5 vs. 96.0 ± 25.5 min; P = 0.002) and higher laboratory costs (Δ+$6.53 ± $5.52 USD; P = 0.041). There were significant differences in operative time (P = 0.014) and labor costs (P = 0.034) between individual surgeons. There was no difference in total costs between specialties or individual surgeons.

CONCLUSION

Surgical subspecialty training does not significantly affect total costs of ACDF procedures. Costs can, however, vary between individual surgeons based on operative times. Variation between individual surgeons highlights potential areas for improvement of the cost effectiveness of spinal procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

回顾性分析。

目的

在科室(骨科与神经外科)及个体外科医生层面比较接受单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)患者的围手术期成本及手术结果。

背景数据总结

医院系统正面临巨大压力,需通过降低成本同时维持或改善以患者为中心的治疗效果来提高医疗价值。很少有研究在科室层面探讨颈椎融合术的成本效益。

方法

对2013年至2015年间在单一学术机构由8位外科医生(4位骨科医生和4位神经外科医生)进行初次单节段ACDF手术的患者进行回顾性研究。通过诊断相关组和手术编码识别患者。纳入国际疾病分类第九版编码为退行性颈椎病变的患者。若患者存在影响住院时间的术前诊断或术后社会工作问题则予以排除。术前人口统计学比较采用学生t检验和卡方分析。围手术期手术结果及医院服务成本比较采用经术前特征调整的多变量回归分析。

结果

共有137例诊断为颈椎退变的患者接受了单节段ACDF手术;其中骨科医生进行了44例,神经外科医生进行了93例。患者人口统计学特征无差异。骨科医生进行的ACDF手术手术时间较短(89.1±25.5分钟 vs. 96.0±25.5分钟;P = 0.002),实验室成本较高(增加6.53±5.52美元;P = 0.041)。个体外科医生之间手术时间(P = 0.014)和人工成本(P = 0.034)存在显著差异。不同科室或个体外科医生之间的总成本无差异。

结论

外科亚专业培训对ACDF手术的总成本无显著影响。然而,成本可能因个体外科医生的手术时间而异。个体外科医生之间的差异凸显了提高脊柱手术成本效益的潜在改进领域。

证据级别

4级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验