• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性躁狂症抗精神病药物治疗中的早期无反应:重新考虑治疗的标准?个体患者数据荟萃分析结果

Early Nonresponse in the Antipsychotic Treatment of Acute Mania: A Criterion for Reconsidering Treatment? Results From an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Welten Carlijn C M, Koeter Maarten W J, Wohlfarth Tamar D, Storosum Jitschak G, van den Brink Wim, Gispen-de Wied Christine C, Leufkens Hubert G M, Denys Damiaan A J P

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, Room PA 2-179, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;77(9):e1117-e1123. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15r10051.

DOI:10.4088/JCP.15r10051
PMID:27780320
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether early nonresponse to antipsychotic treatment of acute mania predicts treatment failure and, if so, to establish the best definition or criterion of an early nonresponse.

DATA SOURCES

Short-term efficacy studies assessing antipsychotics that were submitted to the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board during an 11-year period as part of the marketing authorization application for the indication of acute manic episode of bipolar disorder. Pharmaceutical companies provided their raw patient data, which enabled us to perform an individual patient data meta-analysis.

STUDY SELECTION

All double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials assessing the efficacy of antipsychotics for acute manic episode of bipolar disorder were included (10 trials).

DATA EXTRACTION

All patients with data available for completer analysis (N = 1,243), symptom severity scores on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) at weeks 0, 1, and 2 and at study end point (week 3 or 4).

RESULTS

The a priori chances of nonresponse and nonremission at study end point were 40.9% (95% CI, 38.2%-43.6%) and 65.3% (95% CI, 62.0%-68.6%), respectively. Early nonresponse in weeks 1 and 2, defined by cutoff scores ranging from a ≤ 10% to a ≤ 50% reduction in symptoms compared to baseline on the YMRS, significantly predicted nonresponse (≤ 0% symptom reduction) and nonremission (YMRS score higher than 8) in week 3. The predictive value of early nonresponse (PVnr_se) at week 1 for both nonresponse and nonremission at study end point declined linearly with increasing cutoff scores of early nonresponse; nonresponse: 76.0% (95% CI, 69.7%-82.3%) for a ≤ 10% response to 48.7% (95% CI, 45.5%-51.9%) for a ≤ 50% response; nonremission: 92.2% (95% CI, 88.3%-96.1%) for a ≤ 10% response to 76.8% (95% CI, 74.4%-79.5%) for a ≤ 50% response. A similar linear decline was observed for increasing cutoff scores of early nonresponse at week 2 for nonresponse, but not for nonremission at end point: nonresponse 90.3% (95% CI, 84.6%-96.0%) for a ≤ 10% response to 65.0% (95% CI, 61.4%-68.6%) for a ≤ 50% response; nonremission: 94.2% (95% CI, 89.7%-98.7%) for a ≤ 10% response and 93.2% (95% CI, 93.1%-95.1%) for a ≤ 50% response. Specific antipsychotic characteristics did not modify these findings at either time point (week 1: P = .127; week 2: P = .213).

CONCLUSIONS

When patients fail to respond early (1-2 weeks) after the initiation of antipsychotic treatment for acute mania, clinicians should reconsider their treatment choice using a 2-stage strategy.

摘要

目的

探讨急性躁狂症患者在抗精神病药物治疗初期无反应是否预示治疗失败,若如此,则确定早期无反应的最佳定义或标准。

数据来源

在11年期间提交给荷兰药品评估委员会的评估抗精神病药物的短期疗效研究,作为双相情感障碍急性躁狂发作适应症上市许可申请的一部分。制药公司提供了原始患者数据,这使我们能够进行个体患者数据荟萃分析。

研究选择

纳入所有评估抗精神病药物治疗双相情感障碍急性躁狂发作疗效的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验(共10项试验)。

数据提取

所有可获得完整分析数据的患者(N = 1243),在第0、1、2周以及研究终点(第3或4周)时的杨氏躁狂量表(YMRS)症状严重程度评分。

结果

研究终点时无反应和未缓解的先验概率分别为40.9%(95%CI,38.2%-43.6%)和65.3%(95%CI,62.0%-68.6%)。第1周和第2周的早期无反应,根据YMRS与基线相比症状减轻幅度从≤10%到≤50%的截断分数来定义,显著预测了第3周的无反应(症状减轻≤0%)和未缓解(YMRS评分高于8)。第1周早期无反应(PVnr_se)对研究终点时无反应和未缓解的预测价值随着早期无反应截断分数的增加呈线性下降;无反应:对于≤10%的反应为76.0%(95%CI, 69.7%-82.3%),对于≤50%的反应为48.7%(95%CI, 45.5%-51.9%);未缓解:对于≤10%的反应为92.2%(95%CI, 88.3%-96.1%),对于≤50%的反应为76.8%(95%CI, 74.4%-79.5%)。第2周早期无反应截断分数增加时,对于无反应观察到类似的线性下降,但对于终点时的未缓解则未观察到:对于≤10%的反应,无反应为90.3%(95%CI, 84.6%-96.0%),对于≤50%的反应为65.0%(95%CI, 61.4%-68.6%);未缓解:对于≤10%的反应为94.2%(95%CI, 89.7%-98.7%),对于≤50%的反应为93.2%(95%CI, 93.1%-95.1%)。在两个时间点(第1周:P = 0.127;第2周:P = 0.213)特定抗精神病药物特征均未改变这些结果。

结论

当急性躁狂症患者在开始抗精神病药物治疗后的早期(1 - 2周)无反应时,临床医生应采用两阶段策略重新考虑治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Early Nonresponse in the Antipsychotic Treatment of Acute Mania: A Criterion for Reconsidering Treatment? Results From an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.急性躁狂症抗精神病药物治疗中的早期无反应:重新考虑治疗的标准?个体患者数据荟萃分析结果
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;77(9):e1117-e1123. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15r10051.
2
Baseline Characteristics and Early Response at Week 1 Predict Treatment Outcome in Adolescents With Bipolar Manic or Mixed Episode Treated With Olanzapine: Results From a 3-Week, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.奥氮平治疗青少年双相情感障碍躁狂或混合发作的基线特征和第 1 周的早期反应可预测治疗结局:一项为期 3 周、随机、安慰剂对照试验的结果。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Nov/Dec;78(9):e1158-e1166. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m10923.
3
Extended-release quetiapine as monotherapy for the treatment of adults with acute mania: a randomized, double-blind, 3-week trial.富马酸喹硫平缓释片单药治疗成人急性躁狂症的随机、双盲、3 周试验。
Clin Ther. 2011 Nov;33(11):1643-58. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
4
Placebo response in antipsychotic trials of patients with acute mania: Results of an individual patient data meta-analysis.急性躁狂症患者抗精神病药物试验中的安慰剂反应:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析的结果
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Jul;25(7):1018-26. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.03.010. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
5
Allopurinol for mania: a randomized trial of allopurinol versus placebo as add-on treatment to mood stabilizers and/or antipsychotic agents in manic patients with bipolar disorder.别嘌醇治疗躁狂症:双相情感障碍躁狂患者在心境稳定剂和/或抗精神病药物的基础上加用别嘌醇与安慰剂对照的随机试验。
Bipolar Disord. 2014 Jun;16(4):441-7. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12202. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
6
Quetiapine in the treatment of acute bipolar mania: efficacy across a broad range of symptoms.喹硫平治疗急性双相躁狂症:对广泛症状的疗效。
J Affect Disord. 2007;100 Suppl 1:S5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.02.007. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
7
Olanzapine/fluoxetine combination for the treatment of mixed depression in bipolar I disorder: a post hoc analysis.奥氮平/氟西汀联合治疗双相I型障碍混合性抑郁:一项事后分析
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;70(10):1424-31. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04772gre.
8
Early Antipsychotic Nonresponse as a Predictor of Nonresponse and Nonremission in Adolescents With Psychosis Treated With Aripiprazole or Quetiapine: Results From the TEA Trial.早期抗精神病药物无应答可预测阿立哌唑或喹硫平治疗的青少年精神病患者的无应答和未缓解:TEA 试验的结果。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Aug;61(8):997-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.11.032. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
9
Rapid versus non-rapid cycling as a predictor of response to olanzapine and divalproex sodium for bipolar mania and maintenance of remission: post hoc analyses of 47-week data.快速循环型与非快速循环型作为奥氮平与丙戊酸钠治疗双相躁狂及维持缓解反应的预测指标:47周数据的事后分析
J Affect Disord. 2005 Dec;89(1-3):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.07.011. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
10
Does Insight Affect the Efficacy of Antipsychotics in Acute Mania?: An Individual Patient Data Regression Meta-Analysis.洞察力是否影响抗精神病药物治疗急性躁狂的疗效?一项个体患者数据回归荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016 Feb;36(1):71-6. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000435.

引用本文的文献

1
Does early non-improvement predict treatment failure in pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder? A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis with individual participant data.强迫症药物治疗中早期无改善是否预示治疗失败?一项基于个体参与者数据的诊断试验准确性荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2025 Aug 15;55:e237. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725101335.
2
Treating Bipolar Disorder in Primary Care: Diagnosis, Pharmacology, and Management.基层医疗中双相情感障碍的治疗:诊断、药理学与管理
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Nov 23;15:8299-8314. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S386875. eCollection 2022.
3
Commentary on 'Gender differences in clinical registration trials; is there a real problem?' by Labots et al.
拉博茨等人所著《临床注册试验中的性别差异;是否存在真正的问题?》述评
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;84(8):1639-1640. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13620. Epub 2018 May 31.