Łapaj Łukasz, Mróz Adrian, Kokoszka Paweł, Markuszewski Jacek, Wendland Justyna, Helak-Łapaj Celina, Kruczyński Jacek
a Department of General Orthopaedics, Musculoskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery , Poznań University of Medical Sciences.
b Metal Forming Institute.
Acta Orthop. 2017 Feb;88(1):62-69. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1248202. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
Background and purpose - Severe backside wear, observed in older generations of total knee replacements (TKRs), led to redesign of locking mechanisms to reduce micromotions between tibial tray and inlay. Since little is known about whether this effectively reduces backside wear in modern designs, we examined backside damage in retrievals of various contemporary fixed-bearing TKRs. Patients and methods - A consecutive series of 102 inlays with a peripheral (Stryker Triathlon, Stryker Scorpio, DePuy PFC Sigma, Aesculap Search Evolution) or dovetail locking mechanism (Zimmer NexGen, Smith and Nephew Genesis II) was examined. Articular and backside surface damage was evaluated using the semiquantitative Hood scale. Inlays were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to determine backside wear mechanisms. Results - Mean Hood scores for articular (A) and backside (B) surfaces were similar in most implants-Triathlon (A: 46, B: 22), Genesis II (A: 55, B: 24), Scorpio (A: 57, B: 24), PFC (A: 52, B: 20); Search (A: 56, B: 24)-except the NexGen knee (A: 57, B: 60), which had statistically significantly higher backside wear scores. SEM studies showed backside damage caused by abrasion related to micromotion in designs with dovetail locking mechanisms, especially in the unpolished NexGen trays. In implants with peripheral liner locking mechanism, there were no signs of micromotion or abrasion. Instead, "tray transfer" of polyethylene and flattening of machining was observed. Interpretation - Although this retrieval study may not represent well-functioning TKRs, we found that a smooth surface finish and a peripheral locking mechanism reduce backside wear in vivo, but further studies are required to determine whether this actually leads to reduced osteolysis and lower failure rates.
背景与目的——在老一代全膝关节置换术(TKR)中观察到严重的背面磨损,这促使人们重新设计锁定机制,以减少胫骨托与镶嵌物之间的微动。由于对于这种设计是否能有效减少现代设计中的背面磨损知之甚少,我们对各种当代固定平台TKR的取出物中的背面损伤情况进行了研究。患者与方法——对连续收集的102个带有周边锁定机制(史赛克Triathlon、史赛克Scorpio、德普伊PFC Sigma、蛇牌Search Evolution)或燕尾榫锁定机制(捷迈NexGen、施乐辉Genesis II)的镶嵌物进行了检查。使用半定量胡德量表评估关节面和背面的表面损伤情况。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对镶嵌物进行检查,以确定背面磨损机制。结果——大多数植入物的关节面(A)和背面(B)的平均胡德评分相似——Triathlon(A:46,B:22)、Genesis II(A:55,B:24)、Scorpio(A:57,B:24)、PFC(A:52,B:20)、Search(A:56,B:24)——除了NexGen膝关节(A:57,B:60),其背面磨损评分在统计学上显著更高。SEM研究表明,在采用燕尾榫锁定机制的设计中,背面损伤是由与微动相关的磨损引起的,尤其是在未抛光的NexGen托盘中。在采用周边衬垫锁定机制的植入物中,没有微动或磨损的迹象。相反,观察到了聚乙烯的“托盘转移”和加工平面的变平。解读——尽管这项取出物研究可能无法很好地代表功能良好的TKR,但我们发现光滑的表面处理和周边锁定机制可减少体内的背面磨损,但还需要进一步研究来确定这是否真的能减少骨溶解并降低失败率。