Suppr超能文献

翻修全膝关节置换术中骨质流失的机制及当前的治疗选择。

Mechanisms of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty and current treatment options.

作者信息

Jabbal Monu, Simpson A Hamish Rw, Walmsley Phil

出版信息

Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023 May 24;15:75359. doi: 10.52965/001c.75359. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment which is increasing in use for both elderly and younger patients. With the overall increasing life span of the general population, the rate of revision TKA is projected to increase significantly over the coming decades. Analyses from the national joint registry of England and Wales support this prediction with an increase in primary TKA of 117% and an increase in revision TKA of 332% being forecast by 2030. Bone loss presents a challenge in revision TKA so an understanding of the aetiology and principles behind this is essential for the surgeon undertaking revision. The purpose of this article is to review the causes of bone loss in revision TKA, discuss the mechanisms of each cause and discuss the possible treatment options.

METHODS

The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification and zonal classification of bone loss are commonly used in assessing bone loss in pre-operative planning and will be used in this review. The recent literature was searched to find advantages and limitations of each commonly used method to address bone loss at revision TKA. Studies with the highest number or patients and longest follow-up period were selected as significant. Search terms were: "aetiology of bone loss", "revision total knee arthroplasty", "management of bone loss".

RESULTS

Methods for managing bone loss have traditionally been cement augmentation, impaction bone grafting, bulk structural bone graft and stemmed implants with metal augments. No single technique was found to be superior. Megaprostheses have a role as a salvage procedure when the bone loss is deemed to be too significant for reconstruction. Metaphyseal cones and sleeves are a newer treatments with promising medium to long term outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Bone loss encountered at revision TKA presents a significant challenge. No single technique currently has clear superiority treatment should be based on a sound understanding of the underlying principles.

摘要

目的

初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)是一种有效的治疗方法,在老年和年轻患者中的应用都在增加。随着普通人群总体寿命的不断延长,预计在未来几十年中,翻修TKA的发生率将显著上升。英格兰和威尔士国家关节登记处的分析支持了这一预测,预计到2030年,初次TKA将增加117%,翻修TKA将增加332%。骨丢失在翻修TKA中是一个挑战,因此了解其病因和背后的原则对于进行翻修手术的外科医生至关重要。本文的目的是回顾翻修TKA中骨丢失的原因,讨论每种原因的机制,并探讨可能的治疗选择。

方法

安德森骨科研究所(AORI)分类和骨丢失的分区分类在术前规划中评估骨丢失时常用,本综述将采用这些分类。检索近期文献,以找出每种常用方法在处理翻修TKA骨丢失方面的优缺点。选择患者数量最多和随访期最长的研究作为有意义的研究。检索词为:“骨丢失的病因”、“翻修全膝关节置换术”、“骨丢失的处理”。

结果

传统上,处理骨丢失的方法包括骨水泥增强、打压植骨、大块结构性骨移植和带有金属增强物的带柄植入物。没有发现单一技术具有优越性。当骨丢失被认为对重建来说过于严重时,巨型假体可作为一种挽救手术发挥作用。干骺端锥体和套筒是一种较新的治疗方法,具有良好的中长期效果。

结论

翻修TKA时遇到的骨丢失是一个重大挑战。目前没有单一技术具有明显优势,治疗应基于对基本原理的充分理解。

相似文献

1
Mechanisms of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty and current treatment options.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023 May 24;15:75359. doi: 10.52965/001c.75359. eCollection 2023.
2
Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.
Acta Biomed. 2017 Jun 7;88(2S):98-111. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6520.
5
Bone loss in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: management and outcomes.
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022 Jun 20;34(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s43019-022-00158-y.
6
Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015 Dec;8(4):361-7. doi: 10.1007/s12178-015-9291-x.
7
Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up.
Orthopedics. 2014 Sep;37(9):e804-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140825-57.
8
Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Loss in Revision TKA.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3468-3473. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.025. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
9
Outcomes of a technique combining diaphyseal impaction grafting and metaphyseal cones for severe bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun;102-B(6_Supple_A):116-122. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1511.R1.
10
Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 May;26(5):1500-1505. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4493-y. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
J Knee Surg. 2021 Nov;34(13):1396-1401. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735282. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
2
Current Reconstruction Options in Periprosthetic Fractures Around the Knee.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Aug 27;12:21514593211023996. doi: 10.1177/21514593211023996. eCollection 2021.
3
The Use of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Sep 15;29(18):e904-e920. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01431.
4
Cones and sleeves present good survival and clinical outcome in revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2824-2837. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06670-0. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
7
3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems.
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jun;103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-2504.R1.
8
Role of metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Rationale, indications and long-term outcomes.
J Orthop. 2020 Dec 23;23:107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.014. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
9
Tibial implant fixation in TKA worth a revision?-how to avoid stress-shielding even for stiff metallic implants.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2021 Feb;24(3):320-332. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1830274. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验