Liu Tsai-Ling, Barritt A Sidney, Weinberger Morris, Paul John E, Fried Bruce, Trogdon Justin G
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 26;11(10):e0165574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165574. eCollection 2016.
Increasingly, patients with multiple chronic conditions are being managed in patient-centered medical homes (PCMH) that coordinate primary and specialty care. However, little is known about the types of providers treating complex patients with diabetes and compensated cirrhosis.
We examined the mix of physician specialties who see patients dually-diagnosed with diabetes and compensated cirrhosis.
Retrospective cross-sectional study using 2000-2013 MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental Databases.
We identified 22,516 adults (≥ 18 years) dually-diagnosed with diabetes and compensated cirrhosis. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis, HIV/AIDS, or liver transplantation prior to dual diagnosis were excluded.
Physician mix categories: patients were assigned to one of four physician mix categories: primary care physicians (PCP) with no gastroenterologists (GI) or endocrinologists (ENDO); GI/ENDO with no PCP; PCP and GI/ENDO; and neither PCP nor GI/ENDO. Health care utilization: annual physician visits and health care expenditures were assessed by four physician mix categories.
Throughout the 14 years of study, 92% of patients visited PCPs (54% with GI/ENDO and 39% with no GI/ENDO). The percentage who visited PCPs without GI/ENDO decreased 22% (from 63% to 49%), while patients who also visited GI/ENDO increased 71% (from 25% to 42%).
This is the first large nationally representative study to document the types of physicians seen by patients dually-diagnosed with diabetes and cirrhosis. A large proportion of these complex patients only visited PCPs, but there was a trend toward greater specialty care. The trend toward co-management by both PCPs and GI/ENDOs suggests that PCMH initiatives will be important for these complex patients. Documenting patterns of primary and specialty care is the first step toward improved care coordination.
越来越多患有多种慢性病的患者在以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)接受管理,这些医疗之家负责协调初级和专科护理。然而,对于治疗患有糖尿病和代偿期肝硬化的复杂患者的医疗服务提供者类型,我们了解甚少。
我们研究了诊治同时患有糖尿病和代偿期肝硬化患者的内科专科医生组合情况。
采用2000 - 2013年市场扫描®商业理赔与诊疗记录数据库及医疗保险补充数据库进行回顾性横断面研究。
我们确定了22516名同时患有糖尿病和代偿期肝硬化的成年人(≥18岁)。排除在双重诊断前患有失代偿期肝硬化、艾滋病毒/艾滋病或接受过肝移植的患者。
医生组合类别:患者被分配到以下四种医生组合类别之一:没有胃肠病学家(GI)或内分泌学家(ENDO)的初级保健医生(PCP);有GI/ENDO但没有PCP;PCP以及GI/ENDO;既没有PCP也没有GI/ENDO。医疗服务利用情况:通过四种医生组合类别评估年度医生就诊次数和医疗保健支出。
在整个14年的研究期间,92%的患者就诊于PCP(54%同时就诊于GI/ENDO,39%未就诊于GI/ENDO)。未就诊于GI/ENDO的PCP患者比例下降了22%(从63%降至49%),而同时就诊于GI/ENDO的患者比例增加了71%(从25%增至42%)。
这是第一项具有全国代表性的大型研究,记录了同时患有糖尿病和肝硬化患者所就诊的医生类型。这些复杂患者中很大一部分仅就诊于PCP,但有接受更多专科护理的趋势。PCP和GI/ENDO共同管理的趋势表明,PCMH计划对这些复杂患者很重要。记录初级和专科护理模式是改善护理协调的第一步。