• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[从包含两个强相关预后因素的比例风险模型估计的风险比]

[Hazard ratio estimated from a proportional hazard model including two strongly correlated prognostic factors].

作者信息

Hamajima N, Sasaki R, Shibata A, Suzuki S, Tamakoshi A, Aoki K

出版信息

Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi. 1989 May 20;24(5):1015-9.

PMID:2778377
Abstract

Estimates of hazard ratio from hypothetical survival data were examined, under the condition that the survival is affected by two prognostic factors X1 and X2 with two discrete values (0, 1) which are strongly correlated. Survival curves from the data were assumed to fit an exponential function. As an example, following numbers of subjects were used; 100 cases with X1 = 0 and X2 = 0, 10 cases with X1 = 1 and X2 = 0, 10 cases with X1 = 0 and X2 = 1, and 100 cases with X1 = 1 and X2 = 1. When the hazard ratio of X1 = 1 or X2 = 1 to X1 = 0 and X2 = 0 was 3, univariate analysis gave reasonable estimates around 3. Under the same condition, estimates of hazard ratio from multivariate analysis including the two variables X1 and X2 varied widely, depending on the survivals of 20 cases with X1 = 1 X2 = 0 or X1 = 0 X2 = 1. Probability of having extremely deviated estimates was demonstrated. The result illustrated successfully some points we should take into account when proportional hazard models including strongly correlated variables are applied.

摘要

在生存受到两个预后因素X1和X2影响的情况下,对来自假设生存数据的风险比估计值进行了检验,这两个因素具有两个离散值(0,1)且高度相关。假设数据的生存曲线符合指数函数。例如,使用了以下数量的受试者:100例X1 = 0且X2 = 0,10例X1 = 1且X2 = 0,10例X1 = 0且X2 = 1,以及100例X1 = 1且X2 = 1。当X1 = 1或X2 = 1相对于X1 = 0且X2 = 0的风险比为3时,单变量分析给出了约为3的合理估计值。在相同条件下,包含变量X1和X2的多变量分析得出的风险比估计值差异很大,这取决于20例X1 = 1且X2 = 0或X1 = 0且X2 = 1患者的生存情况。结果证明了出现极端偏差估计值的可能性。该结果成功说明了在应用包含高度相关变量的比例风险模型时应考虑的一些要点。

相似文献

1
[Hazard ratio estimated from a proportional hazard model including two strongly correlated prognostic factors].[从包含两个强相关预后因素的比例风险模型估计的风险比]
Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi. 1989 May 20;24(5):1015-9.
2
[Explanatory essay for researchers who plan to analyse their clinical data using Cox's proportional hazard model].[给计划使用Cox比例风险模型分析其临床数据的研究人员的解释性文章]
Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi. 1989 Mar 20;24(3):579-84.
3
Distinct acidic clusters and hydrophobic residues in the alternative splice domains X1 and X2 of alpha7 integrins define specificity for laminin isoforms.α7整合素可变剪接结构域X1和X2中不同的酸性簇和疏水残基决定了对层粘连蛋白异构体的特异性。
J Mol Biol. 2007 Aug 31;371(5):1188-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.074. Epub 2007 Jun 2.
4
Mathematical models of the effectiveness and persistence of mosquito repellents.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1985 Mar;1(1):56-62.
5
Dealing with the proportional hazards assumption when using the proportional hazards model with a single independent variable.在使用具有单个自变量的比例风险模型时处理比例风险假设。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1989 Sep;19(3):195-201.
6
Incorporation of economic values into the component traits of a ratio: feed efficiency.将经济价值纳入比值的组成特征中:饲料效率。
Poult Sci. 2013 Apr;92(4):916-22. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02688.
7
Heritability, reliability of genetic evaluations and response to selection in proportional hazard models.比例风险模型中的遗传力、遗传评估的可靠性及对选择的响应
J Dairy Sci. 2002 Jun;85(6):1563-77. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74226-4.
8
Under-smoothed kernel confidence intervals for the hazard ratio based on censored data.基于删失数据的风险比的欠平滑核置信区间。
Biom J. 2007 Jun;49(3):474-83. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200610323.
9
Prognostic variables and prognostic groups for malignant melanoma. The information from Cox and Classification And Regression Trees analysis: an Italian population-based study.恶性黑色素瘤的预后变量和预后分组。来自Cox模型及分类与回归树分析的信息:一项基于意大利人群的研究。
Melanoma Res. 2006 Oct;16(5):429-33. doi: 10.1097/01.cmr.0000222602.80803.e1.
10
Reformulating the hazard ratio to enhance communication with clinical investigators.重新构建风险比以加强与临床研究人员的沟通。
Clin Trials. 2008;5(3):248-52. doi: 10.1177/1740774508091452.